2001 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

:: `:'1 l�oa�nds ijiev�v Plana�ing CommYS��on Re�ular 1l�e��iag IYtaY�h 7, 2001 Page 3 znentioned a turn lane on Highway 10 indicating it may be possible to use part of the shoulder to incorporate the tur� ia�e. Director Ericson explained the only accessory structure on the property would be the trasl� enclosure located behind the building. Director Ericson noted tkce drainage plan has been reviewed and approved:by the public worl{s department. He also noted the site will provide less i-unoff to the storm water management.pond .` than originally estimated and stated there will need to be a drainage swale between Mr Winiecki's property and the proposed buiiding. Director Ericson noted that rather than requiring the develc decorative lighting it may be more appropriate to escrow a City to build the trailway after the Highway 10 redevelap� the amoun# of the improvement dedzcatioi� would be $1,4,_I Director Ericson noted Minnesota Institute tor °Publ its Arkoka location to the site and that ihe sign is 32. sign will be set on a masonry base with matei-ials tk� Director Ericson noted there is a so. Mr. Geo�ge Winiecki o: not being able to attend of how`he �arrived at his piece in the Silverview Commission, which is:t not setback even withh up location when he"sc but macle up for losing to btiild,traiiways and provide a�n doliar amouzzt to allow the plan is developed. ' Staff estimates �p, ocate the sign fro�n �v illuminated. The the Commission chooses to do 04,"N.E. Highway 10 addressed the Commission and apologized for pirevious meeting concerning this issue. He then gave a brief I�istory rent business location noting he owned the corner lot that was the key �tes PUD planniug process. Mr. Winiecki then made his point to the his business would be negatively impacted if the proposed building is uilding. Mr: Winiecki tald the Commission that he felt that he gave ie corner lof which allowed the Silverview Es#ates PUD to go forward ,tion with curb appeal as the building he moved into is a very nice Winiecki noted the'';City had led hini to believe the only way to develop the lot he owned was ugh a PUD and so he agreed to the deal to make ifi work. He explained to the Commission �ne concern and request during tlie Silverview Estates PUD plani3ing process was for the tiQn,of the;building that would someday be built on the lot in question. He then explained to �`ommissiori that he thought he had an agreement with the City on the matter. Mr. Winiecki noted he would like the Commission to tell the developer there is a concept plan that is good and require thein to follow it. He then stated he feels betrayed on this issue as fihe other people involved in the transaction have gotten what they wanted and he has noi. Mr. Winiecki provided copies of the 5pring Lalce Parlc, Nevv Brighton, Axden Hills and Shoreview zoning codes as well as Mounds View's code to show that his request to require the