My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I�Iortnds �lierv �lan�a�ng Cornrniss�o� <br />Regular 1l�ee�ing <br />���Ch �, zoo� <br />Page 4 <br />building to be setbacl� even vvith his building is a nonmal and customary practice in surrounding <br />communities. <br />Mr. Jaker, Dzrector of the Minnesota Institute of �Iealth, told tkze Gommissic <br />Winiecki and stated he and his company want to be a good neighbor in Ma� <br />his company is sensitive to enviroxunental issues as it is part of-their busine: <br />environmental issues. He then introduced Mr. Dzurik of McGou�h Constria <br />Mr. Dzurik explained he and his company like to tailor a b <br />which is why they did not canform to the original PUD rec <br />for horizontal e�pansion in the near future, He then expiai <br />costs to move the building back the additiona120 feet. Mr <br />Winiecki's building to view it far line of sight and statad h <br />attention firsi and then the buildi�ig. I�� his opinian, you rii <br />the intersection but by the tzme you reach the access for.th� <br />see Mr, Winiecki's buiiding. <br />Chair ,Stevenson asked zf the developer had'.explored the po <br />�he car wash. <br />Mr. Dzurilc noted they have not <br />would lose an entire entrance if <br />Chair Stevenson note� this i <br />as Mr: j?V�iiiecld is. <br />Mr. Win�ecki rioted the devf <br />developer is incurririg additi <br />problem and, thai he should i <br />Chau Stevenson queshonei�` <br />traveling on Highway iC� ��,; <br />Director Ericson gave a line <br />to see Mr. Winiecki's buildi. <br />have <br />�fically explored that <br />did that. . ; . : <br />felt Mr. i <br />� not be a <br />�ronosed <br />met Mr. <br />�. He stated <br />�e peo.pie on <br />zr client and the site, <br />ting they needed to allow <br />wouid incur additional <br />� he drove by Mr. <br />niecki's, sign draws the <br />; io see tha builcling from <br />�,ilding;tfie eye begins #o <br />the office toward <br />but certainly could noting they <br />with employees'not a business relying on a customer base <br />�d four feet of fill onto the lot wluch is why the <br />rrect the soil. He stated he did not feel this was his <br />for it. <br />t point Mr. Winiecki's building becomes visible when <br />of sight drawing to Chair Stevenson showing a persan wouid be able <br />Zg from the Holiday store. <br />Mr. Winiecki how far back his building is setback frozn Highway 14. <br />stated his building was setbacic approximately 7S feet. <br />Commissioner Hegiand questioned whether there was an agreement in the original concept plan <br />requiring the building to be setbacic even with Mr. Winiecki's building. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.