My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
':1 <br />1VIaund� `laer� PIa��Yng Co�nm��sion <br />Regular IVIeef��g <br />l�areh 7, 200� <br />Pag� � <br />Direc�or Ericson indicated the original concept plan calls for an office building but does not have <br />a specific setback require�nent. He further explained the PUD determines minimuzn setbacks but <br />staied the PUD allows for flexibility. <br />Commissioner Miller aslced if Mr. Winiecki had seen the line of sight drawirig.> <br />Director Ericson noted it is a line of sight to the corner of <br />full effect of what the line of sight is. He then noted the v <br />once the proposed office building is built. <br />Commissioner Kaden explained he had driven by the area <br />atiracts enough attention ta then direct the eye to the build <br />Mr. Wir�iecici stated every one had worked on the <br />wanted the office building to be IQCated as he had <br />Chair Stavenson noted he would need more <br />Director Er�cson noted he would gefi <br />Commis�ioner Miller pointed to <br />asked if it wauld also be followi <br />Mr. Dzurik expiained it � <br />around the exnansion as <br />Mr. Dzurilc pointed out the <br />Mr. Winiecici noted�he has'; <br />Commissiori to require �he'. <br />Mr D'zurilc stated it comes' <br />tlie<side of Mr. Winiecici's <br />7 <br />as <br />zilding so; it is difficult �o get the , <br />building would not be �isible <br />and he <br />and feels that the sign <br />here he <br />at the next meeting. <br />pez�meter of the building and <br />Ein�. <br />fire code and explained it wauld go <br />on the drawing. <br />in busin.ess in Mounds View for 22 years and aslced the <br />,oper to set the building back. <br />to visibility and no matter what a person will not be able to see <br />ig as you can now. <br />she sees ihe sign first and then the building, <br />issioner I�aden commented he would feel better in asking the developer to rnove the <br />g'back if`there was something in writing promising ihe setbacic. He then pointed out the <br />ices Mr. Winiecki had provided copies of outlined a requirement for flexibiiity. He tl�en <br />in his opinion, the deveioper has made a good faith effort to move the building back. <br />Commissioner Hegland noted he would like to see the minutes before making any decisions. <br />MOTI�N/SECOND: Hegland/Cerny. To Table Resolution 650-01 to the next Planning <br />°'� Comrnission Meeting to Allow 5taff Time to Research the Nlatter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.