Laserfiche WebLink
. _ . . . : ... ._... . I.. . . . . . . . _ . .. <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />June 20, 2001 <br />Page 4 <br />Mr. Baumhoefner noted that he felt leaving #he fve {5} foot space behind the shed would Ieave <br />an area to draw yaxd clutter. <br />Mr. Baumhoefner noted ihat, in an effort to protect future property owriers, the shed would be <br />constructed on 12 cement pads to allow the building to be moved in either direction.�` <br />Chair Stevenson opened the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. . <br />Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m <br />Cammissioner Kaden noted that, as has been stated at many meetings, everybody likes to see <br />owners improve their properties. He then noted that, unfortunately, he did not see how the <br />requested variance meets the criteria required. ''''£� � � � ��� � `s ��� <br />F <br />'.'� � <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated he felt that there is.not a l�ardship and that the variance could <br />not be granted. ,�'"�: ' •� ' "`��' <br />xz� - <br />, <br />. � , ,.. <br />�� =r�>�xi���� � <br />MOTION/SECOND: Zwirn/Scotch. To Approve Resolution 6b0=01, a Resolution Denying a <br />Variance From the Minimum Setback�tequirement;foT Accessory�Structures to Allow for a <br />Zero-Foot Setback for a Storage Shecl�ozi the Property Located'at 5532 St. Stephen Street. <br />2 ,.. <br />Ayes b , NaXs ,=`0 Motion carried. <br />.�`� <br />Chair Stevenson noted the applicant could go before fhe City Council as Council can overrule a <br />denial;by the Planning Commission if it finds just cause. <br />Community D�'velopment Dzrector Encson also noted that, if the applicant chooses to appeal the <br />decision, he v�iould need';something in wnting within two weeks to get the matter on the City <br />Council agenda fi ' � ' ' <br />;- �� ,� , <br />6. ` Planning Case No `�1Z01�-006 <br />�.K T:: <br />�. � <br />Planner Atkinson noted�that the applicant from 2832 Ardan Avenue has requested a variance to <br />•be':allowed to place a six (6) foot tall fence in his front yard as defined by City Cade. <br />� $ <br />�<�.� <br />Planrier Atkinson noted that there were two issues with the case. Planner Atkinson noted the <br />"fir�t issue is that it is a corner lot and the Commission must consider if that is enough of a <br />"hardship to grant the variance. He then noted the second issue is the grade change from <br />Groveland to the house. He further explained there is a two-foot grade change and noted that <br />needed to be considered. <br />Chair Stevensan asked for clarification of where the six (5) foot fence would be located. <br />:, <br />.:) <br />