My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
: , � <br />Mounds View Planning Commissio� June 20, 2001 <br />` Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />Planner Atkinson noted the six (6) foot fence would be located around the entire property and <br />indicated the bracketed area on the drawing is where the four (4) foot requirement is located. <br />Chair Stevenson noted there are several instances where corner lots do have s.ix "(b7 foot fences to <br />the side of the residence which fronts on one o#'the streets. He tYien noted that the circumstances <br />af the corner lot are difficult, as it appears there is street frontage as defined by Crty Code but the <br />resident treats it as a sideyard. <br />Commissioner John.son indicated he would call it the sideyard:of:the residence. He then �noted: � <br />that the Silver Lake Raad development has six (6) foot fences <br />,:. <br />Planner Atkinson noted the City is dealing with a technicality, as it is a front yard based on City <br />code. <br />Cornmissioner Kaden asked what type of fence Mr VandenEinde intended to use. <br />Mr. VandenEinde noted the fence would be located around:the property lie considers to be his <br />side and backyards. He noted the reason for the request is that the four (4} foot height is not <br />sufficient to contain his twin daughters due to the tw`o'foot grade"change on the Groveland side. <br />, �. <br />�,_ , .; -= <br />Chair Stevenson noted he could sit at his kitchen-counter and see into Mr. VandenEinde's <br />backyard and noted there is defvutely a grad��change. ,_'�`` <br />�,� .., � r_.... , <br />• � � �-s°. <br />Mr. VandenEinde noted .there is a�line of tri <br />roots cati be :avoided wheri ;�ansti�u�ting the <br />property lme v�nth:his fence 1ocaC�on E� : <br />�r.a; _. , -,�: <br />Mr. Vand <br />neighbor. <br />sra <br />fence would need to be inside of so the <br />then noted that he should be well off the <br />cedar boards to match the fence of his <br />,,� :_� <br />Chair'Stevenson inquired:as to t1ie;:Groveland right of way requirement and noted that the fence <br />wouTd need to be located inside of that. <br />1V1x. VandenEinde indicated he was told that his property line would be located thirty (30) feet <br />':;'from the center of the road. <br />Y' '�; <br />G1�aYr:Stevenso� opened the puhlic hearing at 7:33 p.m. <br />Chair Stevenson ciosed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he feels there is a hardship due to the difference in grade and noted he <br />had no problem granting the variance requesied. <br />Comrnissioner Johnson indicated he would like to direct Staff to draft a Resolution of approval <br />for action at the next meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.