My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
- , <br />;. , <br />Mounds View Planning Commission June 20, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />Director Ericson indicated that the other issue involved is that the driveway needs to he located <br />50 feet from the intersection of two street rights of way. <br />Commissioner Johnson further clarified that the reference to the 125 feet of frontage is for <br />commercial usage and noted that the City typically does not give; �ommercial �developments that <br />many curb cuts. <br />Harold Vierkant of 8071 Red Oak Drive stated he feels the i��f,fic coun� is higher now than.in <br />1997 and stated he feels the property owner needs the new�'dnvewa� as the current driveway'is <br />unsafe. He fuxther commented he felt it would be safer to p�i°1`1 �'o�ward, out of the new driveway <br />� <br />rather than to back out of the existing driveway. � ,��5a�� �� � a <br />,;,n � � � � ,; <br />, � � <br />Chair Stevenson indicated that there are other residents in'the City who back into their driveways <br />in order to be able to pull out when they leave as they do nq#.;feel it is saf� to back into the <br />�; ., <br />roadway from their driveway. <br />; . . � �, _:- z 4�;e„ <br />Mr. Irken indicated that traffic on Red Oak Dnve wilt not aliow tYiern to back into their <br />driveway. He then indicated he is in favor of the secoiid curb cut .as there are six other properties <br />with second curb cuts on Red Oak Drive: ' i � <br />Jerry Moylin of 2708 Sherwood Raad indicated that to his kriowledge there have been no <br />changes in traffic flows by the City or Countyain this particular location in the 23. years he has <br />- lived there.-, ,He noted the number,of cars has iiicreased l�u# stated he goes through the <br />intersection in ,question three or. fotu times a� day and lias not waited very long which makes him <br />skeptical�of the;need of the�property,owner to�wait to get into line to get on the highway. <br />�, ,�;�� <br />` , `'�h��� ������ � <br />Mr. Moylm noted the�previous fioine owners managed quite well with the driveway they had. <br />He then indicated thaf;`as.far as tfie safetySissue is concerned, the existing driveway on that <br />property comes;�ust b�f�re'people ar�,�lowing down to stop at the stop sign and the temporary or <br />proposed'..new drive'vvay wilJ, b� in the acceleration path of people coming through the <br />intersection which he f��l��i� much more dangerous. <br />P <br />, }�� ..,=x ;-,,,; <br />Coitimissioner Kaden indicated the traffic count number on the handout received looks like 1900 <br />cars not 1000 cars as earlier indicated. <br />Chair Stevenson confirmed that the traffic count at Red Oak Drive and Hillview appeared on the <br />map to �be L900. <br />Commissioner Hegland asked how the traffic numbers were determined. <br />Dizector Ericson indicated a cable was strung across the road to count vehicles. <br />Commissioner Hegland questioned whether every axle was recorded or if the 1900 was an actual <br />vehicle count. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.