Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />June 20, 2001 <br />Page 13 <br />Commissioner Johnson noted the new curb cut would need to be in compliance with City code. <br />A resident asked if the driveway could be used prior to resolution of the matter. <br />Chair Stevenson clarified that the residents were not to use the,driveway until the variance is <br />approved. <br />Chair Stevenson noted if the variance is approved at the next meeting the matter would nat be <br />going before the City Council. <br />� �; ' <br />Community Development Director Ericson informed the <br />663-01 regarding the Vanden Einde variance request was <br />Planner Atkinson presented the resolution and <br />were necessary. Chairman Stevenson indicatec <br />_,�,,, <br />� <br />MOTION/SECOND: / . To approve ResoluYion G63�. <br />variance to allow a six-foot tall fence to, lie located ,i�'°the front y <br />2832 Ardan Avenue. <br />Ayes — 6 � ` ' Nays-O � <br />�': <br />��-�. <br />, <br />w, ��';rrnnn nn� <br />8. � Plamm�g Case <br />�� <br />,, � ; <br />Commututy Developin� <br />that the building need'ei <br />noted that the matteX w� <br />the building needed to;.l <br />,; , <br />,,�. <br />Director Ericson noted <br />no`bay or projecting wi <br />�� �-:., <br />�e adjoining property � <br />;;ap�roval on June 25, 2� <br />e� �;e . <br />oirimission that Resolution <br />md ready;for their review. <br />any changes <br />a'resolution approving a <br />of the property located at <br />Motion carried. <br />�: <br />Director Encson_explained that the building official had deterniined <br />� be mod�fi�ed-in oider to meet state accessibiiity requirements. He <br />iiscussed a� lerigth at the previous meeting and it was determined that <br />i fii11. two stories to meet the accessibility requirements. <br />1. <br />�ere"were to be no windows on the upper story south elevation and <br />s�on the east side elevation to mizumize #he peripheral site lines for <br />. He then noted this matter would be before the City Council for <br />:.I?E �� :`.:; <br />1VIOTIQN/SECOND: Hegland/Stevenson. To Approve Resolution 662-01, a Resolution <br />Recommending Approval of an Increased Building Height for a Proposed Office Building at <br />7664 Greenfield Avenue. <br />Commissioner Hegland noted that this is not a design the City is requiring and noted that the <br />design is a result of the requirements of the State Accessibility Code. <br />Director Ericson noted the Resolution indicated the design had heen changed to comply with the <br />State Accessibility Code. <br />