Laserfiche WebLink
;_ _ ___ __ . <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />Chair Stevenson closed the pnblic hearing at 8:45 p.m. <br />June 20, 2001 <br />Page 12 <br />� <br />MOTTON/SECOND: Stevenson/Zwirn. To Approve Resolution 661-01, a Resolution Denying <br />a Request for a Variance to Allow a Second Curb Cut at 8081 Red:Oak Drive: <br />Community Development Director Ericson noted the Resolu�i�in, if approved;� will rec�uire a <br />further stipulation that the right of way and boulevard area needs to be restored. <br />� �;- � � . <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if the proposed alriveway was�Class S:or asphalt. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Class 5 driveways are no longer allowed by City code but noted a <br />parking area of 300 square feet or less of Class 5 is allowed. �: <br />Commissioner Johnson clarified that the grass on the bou�eVard would need to be`restored but <br />noted the Class 5 eould be left in place for a parkmg area '; �;�;, <br />�-� <br />�;w ,,� � <br />,;�_� , ;� <br />Director Ericson indicated a permit would be 'required bltt noted th�e area could be used for a <br />parking area ` ' � f ; <br />;�� ,� �; <br />�� <br />Chair Stevenson clarified that five (5} feet of the boulevard and the curb cut would need to be <br />replaced if the Class 5 were used for a�`�iarking,ar��a. <br />Director Ericson noted the Resolution would be arne�i�ecl to require that a permit be obtained and <br />all City codes complied w�tf��� '��' �:> � " �� ''��'°� � <br />ra ' � � � � �`�'t � <br />� '�'' ` Xk ' �a(� :: .. � <br />, �q <br />'`` Ayes = 2 '.`i�� .Nays — 4(Hegland/Kaden/Scotch/Johnson} Motion failed, <br />E� , <br />Chair Stevenson asked �he Comminssiori if�it'wanted to direct Staff to bring a Resolution for <br />approvai o£the,:�aria�ce b�fare the Coinrilission at the next meeting. <br />Director Ericson noted the ,next Planning Commission meeting would be held on July 18, 2001. <br />Coinmissioner Kaden asked Director Ericson to comment on the pubiic safety aspect of the <br />�ardship requirement. �� <br />Director Ericson noted that the Planning Commission could give added weight to the safety issue <br />and can add,,thatt� to the hardship but no#ed the Cominission still needed to establish that there is a <br />hardship:; � <br />Commissioner Kaden asked if the Planning Commission should make a change to the City code <br />for future situations. <br />Director Ericson noted that the Planning Commission can suggest changes to the Code at any <br />time it feels it is appropriate. <br />=='� <br />= -� <br />