2001 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

Clasen CUP July 18, 260I Page 2 There is a variety of housing styles and sizes in the immediate area of �1ze subject property. Lots to the north are generally similar in size, while lots to the immediate south are Iarger. The property owner to the north will be most affected by the proposal. The garage addition will be located on the north side of the property, six (6) feet from the property line. There is virtually no screening along �his property line. The property to the north does have a detached shed in the southwest portion of the properiy that may screen a portion of the addition. The proposed addition will be sepazated &om the western property Iine by 52 feet, which should not affect the neighbor directly behind Mr. Clasen's property in a negative manner. AIl properiies within 350 feet have been notified ofthe request, and at this time, staff has not received any correspondence from any neighbor. Recommendation: After holding the public hearing and discussing this request with the property owner, staff would recommend that the Planning Commission review the testimony and any adverse affects that would be caused by this request to determine if there is a legitimate basis for recommending approval of the conditional use permit to the City Council. Staff has prepared a Resolution that �he Planning Commission may choose to act on if they feel that approval of the conditional use permit is the appropriate course of action. I#'the Commission feels that adverse affects on the neighborhood would be too great to warrant approval, they should direct staff to draft the appropriate Resolu�ion for action at the next regularly scheduled meeting on August 1, 2001, f . �' �V V�... Jim Atkinson, Planner (763)717-4022 Attachments: 1. Development Application 2. Location Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Site Plan 5. Resolution 666-01 +;; . ;j