My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds Vfevv PIanning Commission <br />Regalar Mleefing <br />4. Ap�aroval of I�Iinutes <br />A. 1)ece�ber b, 2000 <br />MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Cerny. To approve the <br />presented. <br />Ayes — 6 Nays - 0 <br />5. PIans�ing Case l�io. DE00-002 <br />Property Involved: 7664 Greenfzeld Avenue <br />Review and Discuss �ite Plans for a 3,500 Square-Foo. <br />Applicant: Tony Mezzenga <br />Community Development Director Ericsan <br />build a 3,500 square-foot, one and a half stc <br />property is zoned B-3 Highway Business;:�li <br />setbacics there are practical difficiilties'�n vv <br />before the Planning Commission i�1 Septem <br />6, 2000 <br />ed. <br />Bui <br />January 3, 2001 <br />Page 2 <br />; <br />;:;1yJ.ixluTes as <br />�lained the appl�cazit has r.eguested permission to <br />office i�ullding at 7664 Greenfield Avenue. This <br />ever. due to the size of t11e lot and corner 1ot <br />;III� <br />borders commercial property to the;�west a Toui�'Thum <br />east. Staff has reviewed the s�te plan and City �ode �E <br />concern in the, staff report IVIr Mezzenga is not able ° <br />14 stalls which�;iransia�te into a�i� <br />applicant anticipates a total of 2, <br />need to Ue re�iised to oo�nnlv wit <br />cto� Ericson addre"ssf <br />cating that s#aff spokf <br />se the plan to include. <br />ts would need to bee:-i <br />�: <br />r�eighborhood <br />[opeci which is why this matter was <br />. a variance was granted. This lot <br />re�` and zesidential properties to the <br />:ments and outlined items of issue or <br />present at this maeting. <br />;parking lot requirements have been met. The site plan shows <br />Kimuin leaseable office area of 2,800 square feet. The <br />)0 sq�are feet of leaseable office space. The plan wili however <br />AT�A parking requirements. <br />�ci that the site plan does not show any parking lot lighting, <br />Mezzenga regardin� this issue and Mr. Mezzenga has agreed to <br />e of lights on the building to illuminate the p.arlcing lot. The <br />or shielded to prevent glare and be downcast so as not to disturb <br />�irector Erieson p�inied out that the lot is relatively flat with little if any change in elevation. <br />There n�ay he a slight build up at the site of the building pad. Staff has suggested a slight <br />elevation slope to allaw stormwater zunoff to flow to the green space area to be filtered befare <br />ent�nng the stormwater systern. If thera are any changes in elevation it will be required to be <br />reflected on the siie plan. The site plan will need to be amended to reflect the direction of <br />stormwater nanoff. <br />Director E�icson indicated that the applicant had not yet submitted a landscaping plan. He <br />referred to a site plan inciuded with the Commission's report which could provide the basis for a <br />landscaping plan, yet cautioned that the staff-drawn plan was simple and would need to be <br />considered further by Mr. Mezzenga and the City Forester before a final plan is approved. <br />�� <br />; <br />, :i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.