2001 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

Mounds V�ew Planning Commission Regular Mteetir�g Director Ericson reported that the building exterior would be constructed of bri the botiom half—story of the building and a wood-gained type of maintenance top of the building. He indicated that staff wonld like #o see the sair�e type.of e construction carried over to the side of the building facing County Road I as w� four sides. At a minin2um, he expiained, the frontages need to:be dressed up. ` ,�anuary 3, Zoai Page 3 : or cut stone on ;e si�ding on the eriar , if not on all Addressing signage, Director Ericson said he had spolcen with Mr. Mezzenga who indicaied he would lilce to leave signage up to the tenants af the building.; D�rector Erzcson explained that he informed Mr. Mezzenga that due to the buildiz�g being locatecl in. a predominately residential area, a monument type of sign would be prefe;rred over a pylon type of sign.. Director Ericson further stated that he had addressed all of the outstanding issues and site plan defzciencies with Mr. Mezzenga, and informed Mr. -Mezzenga he would be requi,red to amend tlie plans accordingly, Director Ericson summarized that tl�e sxte plari needs to, be "revised to allow far a building setbacic of 30 feet from County Road I and ten �'eet from tbe t�vest property line, that the par%ing lot needs to have perimeter`curbing wzth bre�ks or cuts identified for drainage, that a van-accessible handicapped sfall would need t� be shown on'the`plan, and identificatian of building and parlcing lot lighting, if any: He indicated that the floar plans would need to identify the scale and show office square footage and room dimensions�'and a computation of the total Ieaseable ofiice area. In addition,.he reported that a grading;plan would need to be submitted if subs#antial grading is to occur or' general elevations sllown on the site plan with arrows to indicate the elirection of storinwater runoff. Directa� Ericson xestated that a landscaping plan Director concernmg tnrs ,� 2000 meetin� if locat�ons, a��d guantities of the planimgs to be used would need to be a detailed descriptiorz of any proposed signage if lcnown at this point. logized to residents �or not being able to provide more notice of the meeting �;building. He stated that this matter would be discussed at the January 17, lents were unable to attend this meeting. Vice'Chairperson Steven�ozi �reguested the parlcing lot spaces be drawn to scale on the site plan map when it is brought back before the Pianning Commission. Gommissioner Miller_-inquired as to how many handicapped parking stalls were requi�-ed for this building. Commu�uty Deveiopment Director Ericsan indicated there is a ratio that starts with 1 to 25 and goes dowri after that. One handicapped accessible spot would be required for this building. Vice Chairperson Stevenson requested the Commission address the concerns raised at the meeting in September 2400 for faot traffic across the lot. Mr. Gustafsan, the property owner, suggested using shrubbery or some type of landscaping to discourage foot �raffic and force ii down to County Road I. Vice Chairperson Stevenson inquired as to what the plan was to discourage foot traffic on the