My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, i.: : __ _ _ <br />i . : - ;,.. <br />. .����_: . �.-� � . �- r: -.�<... ...._ .. �.. �.�.::-:�- � - - � .. � � � <br />Mounds View Plann,ing Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />June 4, 2001 <br />Page $ <br />be financially advantageous for him to construct this 8-foot fence. He said he would not build a <br />10-foot fence. <br />Chair Stevenson closed the public hearing. <br />Chair Stevenson inquired whether there will be any changes. in the building matenal; 1VIr. <br />Mezzenga stated there would not he. <br />Directar Ericson pointed out there is no resolution attached;= Tliis'item is for discussion only � <br />Commissioner Kaden expressed his disappoinknent that this was such a controversial issue and <br />yet it came back. He noted that this proposal would most likely be: worse:from the residents' <br />point of view. He said he would have to agree with building the second �sto ,ry; though he was not <br />happy about it. <br />Chair Stevenson stated he reluctantly approved;;the proposal tlxe �first time ,He doesn't see many <br />options. He recommended approval. <br />ti, _, . . �� � .._ <br />Mr. Zwirn asked if the cost factors <br />been explored. He felt more consi� <br />comply with City Code. ,{; <br />Director Ericson suggested <br />the fiQures�and submit thert <br />a one ari�'a half story�'arici a two-story building had <br />hould'�be given to.�he cost factors invoIved to <br />�,4� �. :.' . <br />d �;;'F��lf, � :'iE: " <br />Eh���ost:f�c�tor`simore. He stated he would research <br />nendarion fo the Council. <br />9. Pla�ining `Case; No. M�'��`=°0�0��t ���. <br />�., ,�,; t'� x�.:��'�� <br />Community De�relopment Director Encson reported NIr. Harstad had submitted a request far a <br />�9:'[ g <br />subdivisibn.' The piopertyis;�zdned R-I and is appropriate for single family residential. The <br />propas�i is for 11 lots for` sirigle family residential. The issue is whether the lots are buildable. <br />The ;wetlands and drainage i�, t��� area must be considered. The Staff considered retaining some <br />trees adjacent to Longview Dnve. Director Ericson staied the applicant offered to save any trees <br />tiiat could be saved. A neighborhood meeting was held. The applicant was present at the <br />riieeting and stated his.��i"ntent was that 90 feet from Longview Drive would be cleared. Director <br />Ericson stated as Mr::`Harstad is the owner/operator of the property, he would have the option to <br />do.�as�e,wants: ° . <br />� ., - <br />,�, .�k <br />Clia� Stevenson opened the public hearing. <br />Martin Harstad, son of Keith Harstad, the property owner, was present. Mr. Harstad explained <br />his father has retired and turned this properiy over to the children. He would be speaking on <br />behalf of the family. <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.