Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />, : .: <br />-----� <br />-- <br />: _... <br />.. . _: , . -- <br />-:- � .. -- - _ - <br />i� <br />i, <br />Mounds View Planning Commission Augusf 15, 2001 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />Community Development Director Ericson reviewed actions taken at the August 13, 2001 City <br />Council meeting. He advised the conditional use permit for the animal hospital was reviewed <br />and staff recommended it be tabled so 4rdinance 685 could have first reading, second reading, <br />and adoption. He noted that amendment will conditionally allow animal boarding so once <br />adopted, the animal hospital boarding request can be considered as a conditional use permit. <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated the Walgreen'sproject is near comgletion and <br />Council has accepted the improvements on that site conditioned on Rice Creek Watershed <br />District approval (which was received today}, and the pathway being striped in the.driveway. He <br />advised the City Forester reviewed the landscaping and ,ViWalgreen'.s �agreed to maintain the; <br />landscaping to the point the City main#ains the highway ditch to create'a manicured appearauce. <br />Community Development Director Ericson stated the Council approv�ed a liquor and restaurant <br />license for t]�e Knotty Pines Tavem and Grill (formerly Dox�atell�!_"s) and;1t, is expected to open in <br />; <br />several days. � <br />���.: `' r'_�:�ia��' n'�r�� . . <br />Community Development Dizector Ericson reported th� conditional use permit for the oversize <br />garage was approved by the Council. • v -°� � t " w ' <br />, <br />,�. , ��� <br />;�. �� �, � , �- : <br />Chair Stevenson stated the variance criteria for hardahips carne mto''question at the Council <br />meeting. Community Development Direetor Encson explained`,t�at 1VIr. Baurnhofner appealed <br />the Planning Commission denial whicli �esulted in, a lot of discussion. He explained that while <br />the Council may have supported consideration; � they realized they are bound by the same <br />rationale for granting a variance as�.is the Planniiig Comm�s'sion. In additian, the City Attorney <br />advised that they would have to' draft findirigs of fact and address each of �he seven variance <br />criteria. The: Council unanimously upheld tlie Planning Cornniission recommendation of denial. <br />.� <br />Commuruty Development � Direcfor Ericson advised that Neal Zinser is working with Ernie <br />Gustafson on-� subdivision pro�ect r�hic� would be considered by the Planning Commission at <br />its next meeting H� noted if the"mtddTe.,1Qt° on County Road I was zoned R-2, it would xesult in <br />setbacks that would� �ecessitate a vanan'.ce. The application indicates they are no longer looking <br />for an R-2, .designation so,; it :would be R-1. However, the corner lot would not meet the R-1 <br />, <br />requirements. He e� <br />gettir�g any closer to <br />up is based on the location of Mr. Gustafson s house since <br />result in the need for an additional variance. <br />I�T�aI Zinser, Hamilton��Creek Companies, introduced himself and stated he has entered into a <br />': contract with Mr. Gus�ta`fson to purchase the land and also entered into contracts with buyers o£ <br />{ ..: .- �s. <br />_ the;:homes that woul� be constructed. He stated there are currently interested buyers for a ots <br />��except Lot 2 vyh�re'they intend to construct a house that is complimentary to the other homes. <br />I3e adui5ed tliey'`will meet with the buyer of Lot 5 tomonow subject to receiving the variances. <br />`Mr ' Zuiser stated they are ready to comply with City requirements and will measure the area to <br />assure`they meet the setbacks from Long Lake Road. He stated the only remaining issue is with <br />Lot 3. Mr. Zinser stated they want to be a compliment to Mounds View. <br />Commissioner Miller asked if the St. Paul Wafierworks will impact the project. Mr. Zinser stated <br />their surveyor has been in contact with them to determine the exact location. <br />