My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I�ound� '�iew Planni�g Comn�ission January 17, 2001 <br />Reg€�lai-1�Iee�ing Page 7 <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson explained the six (6) foot pri��acy %1�ce wouid need to start <br />even with Mr. Zwirn's house not in front of it. <br />Con�rnunity Development Director Ericson indicated Staff had drafted a resolutian <br />recommending to Council approval of the develapment review requesfi witli stipulations, <br />assuming the Commission had no other concerns. He read the stipulations as lfsied m the <br />resolution to the Cammission. _ . <br />Can�missioner Miller inquired as to vvhether• the axchi <br />consistent alolig the west elevation of the building. <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated it was <br />Cammission to decide whether it wanted to require the archi <br />on all four sides9 the sides fronting the streets, or just the sicl <br />Avenue. , . <br />Corrunissioner Johnson aslced Commissianer <br />be briciced. <br />Coznmissioner Miller indicated the <br />brick would be nicer to look at than <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson <br />said bricic was not needed o.n <br />Consent.was i-eae�ied by`the; <br />the buildzng ta %e. liriciced, in <br />MOTION/SEC�ND: Cerny <br />for <br />of <br />west <br />side c <br />siding <br />l:features wouid be <br />�p" to tlie Planning <br />.ectural %atures ;be the same <br />; fronting Greenfield <br />felt tlae west side needs to <br />is also exposed to traffic and <br />�d and should be bricl� but <br />n�issiori to require the north and west sides of <br />the front facing Greenfield Avenue. <br />o To Approve Resolution No. 646-01, a Resolution <br />'ttional Use Permit and Development Review Request <br />Located at 76b4 Greenf eld Avenue. <br />Nays — 4 Motion carried. <br />iity Developm�rit Direcior Ericson indicated this inatter would be heard by <br />on February 12� 2041. <br />d �igns <br />Case I�To. �1'�082-{�0 — Continuaiion of Sign Code fl2evi��v — <br />Community Development Director Ericson aslced ihe Pianning Commission to consider <br />what is cunently allowed by code for height of sign, the sign area, the number of sucli <br />signs ailowed per lot and the se�backs required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.