Laserfiche WebLink
IViouncts �iew P�annnt�g Caasimi�sio� <br />12egular IVleeting <br />Ja�uary 4i, 2001 <br />Page � <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson noted the docuxnent received from Staff on November 15, <br />2000 contained a table stating gxouxad signs in R3, R4, and RS vvere to be no taller than <br />six feet from grade. Vice Chairperson Stevenson inquired as to wheiher ihe primary <br />reason for that was ta address apartments for rent. <br />Communiiy Development Direcior Ericson explained that <br />the code but was added by Staff for consideratian. There � <br />allowance because signs are not currently allowed, yet if s <br />there should be a height limitation. <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson noted Staif would need to note`1; <br />that pedestal signs and freestaz�ding signs are now referred to <br />clarification. <br />Community Development Director Ericson <br />terms Staif believed to be duplicative and u <br />Vice Chairperson Stevenson asked if the <br />maj ority o£ tk�e sign code. <br />Community Development Director Encson inc <br />table was currently in the sign code. ,'The table <br />ent was <br />ly isn't s <br />is allow <br />t pecies�al an.d fre� <br />ry as ground sign <br />15, 2000 drait do� <br />in the sign code <br />�i�;ns for <br />both. <br />covered the <br />cl everything with the exception of the <br />Staffls addition for consideration. <br />Community,Development Director Ericson stated.it was'Staf�s mistalce not to be <br />,�. <br />consiste�t with the rewrite by i�aidcrizning what was r�ew and crossing off anything Staff <br />felt couid be deieied. Tlie dociunent is z�ot a true�reflection of what is in the code but <br />what could �ossib�y. be done to' c�ean it up. <br />Community Developxi�ent Director Ericson inquired as to whether the Planning <br />Commissio� was happy with the listed heigY�ts for signs and the areas the various height <br />ninissioner Hegland inquired as to whether it was possible to put togethez a sign code <br />t'is progressiveiy m.ore resinctive based on zoning that would simplify this discussion, <br />then aslced if Staff eould put together a chart based on that information. <br />' Goi�nunity Develop�rient Director Ericson indicated that is basically what �taff has done <br />v�th �he November'`15, 2000 document refei�red ta by Vice Chairperson Stevenson, <br />�. <br />The Planiziiaig Commission took a brief brealc to allow Comnlunity Deveiopment Director <br />Ericson to malce some copies of tl�e November 15, 2000 document ta be reviewed. <br />Vice Chairperson Stevensan suggested a statemen� be added to the definitions indica�ing <br />that fhe definition of freesianding and pedestal signs are now referred to as ground signs. <br />1 <br />1 <br />