My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 17, 2001. <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br />Planner Atkinso�a indicated the major issue is with the access point as the major frontage is on <br />the access drive and not a full width street. He then indicated the property does, however, have a <br />short distance fronting on Oakwaod Road and the applicant is proposing that his driveway attach <br />to the access drive and then out to Oakwood Road. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated he had been in ongoing discussionswith the public works forernan <br />who had indicated it would be possible to �ant the applicant permission to use the access drive <br />provided the applicant agree to maintain the access drive. He then asked the Commission to <br />consider the request noting that there is an existing gate that would need to be moved back to <br />accommodate the applicant's request. <br />Planner Atkinson noted that the park dedication fee for this subdivision would be approximately <br />$2,609.00 and said there was no resolution for approval as the matter needs to be discussed. <br />Commissioner Miller asked if it would be possible to open up any other lots for development in <br />the area. : <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that ihe neighbor #o the north had`'expressed an interest in developing <br />her property until she was informed of the cost of the required roadway. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated he had spoken to a property owner a little farther north on Spring <br />Lake Road who was concerned that if this were done with the private access road it would <br />prohibit further development.up Spring Lake�Road .,He;then indicated that it would be difficult <br />, �.� ,r . <br />to extend that private road ii�to a� real road because tfie townhornes are loca#ed so close to the <br />access drive. : <br />Chair Stevenson indicated he user� to live in the area and noted that the City had assured <br />residents at the tirne ttiat Knollwood Green was approved that the access drive was for <br />emergency purposes only and would never be converted to a standard roadway. He then <br />indicated that he would never vote to approve anything that would ever convert the private drive <br />to a standard xaadway. , <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated that the access drive was for emergency access only. <br />Chair Stevenson indicated if the access drive were opened up everyone in #he area would be up <br />in arms because it was a contested issue at the time. He then indicated he did not have a problem <br />with allowing access onto the Oakwood Road extension. He further indicated that the City <br />would need to cliange how it plows that s�reet, <br />Planner Atkinson indicated he would discuss snow removal with Mr. Pittman. <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if there was enough frontage on Oakwood Road for a driveway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.