My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
2001 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 9:14:03 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 4:13:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
932
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Mounds Vie�v Ite�, #? <br />� Planning Commission Report <br />Meeting Date: Dece�aaber 19, 2001 <br />Title: <br />PUBLIC HE�IRING AND CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 681-01, A <br />RESOLUTION AMENDING PREVIOUSLY APPROVED RESOLUTION 633-00, A <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARi.ANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />7664 GREENFIELD AVENUE, REQUESTED BY MR. TONY MEZZENGA; MOUNDS <br />VIEW PLANNING CASE # VR00-007 <br />Introduct�on: <br />On September 13, 2000, the Mounds View Plamung Commission adopted Resolution <br />633-00, a resolution approving a variance for the property located at 7b64 Greenfield <br />Avenue for reduced front and side-yaxd parking lot setbacks, reduced side and rear yard <br />Uuilding setbacks, reduced parking 1ot width and reduced off-sireet parking requirements. <br />The approved variance allowed Mr. Mezzenga to proceed with development plans for ihe <br />property. The plans ini�ially indicated a one and one-hal£ story office building with a <br />footprint o£ 2,404 square feet. Because of accessibility issues, ihe plans were revised and <br />approved for a two-story building with the same footprint and same overall square <br />footage. Upon application to Ramsey County for a right of way pernut to install the <br />driveway onto County Road I, the applicant was told the driveway could not be installed <br />there due to the presence of a couniy integrated storm sewer catch basin. The catch basin <br />could not be moved or reconstructed, and the driveway could not be safely relocated onto <br />County Road I, so the applicant request a further change to the site plan to allow for <br />access onto Greenfield Avenue instead of County Road I. This revision was approved by <br />the City Council ori November 13, 2001. <br />Discussion: <br />It was learned during the last plan revision that the �riveway, as originally approved last year by <br />the Planning Commission and City Council, did not meet proper setback requirements from the <br />intersection of Greenf eld and County Road I. Oz-iginally the pIans showed the driveway set back <br />37 feet from the intersecting right of ways. The required setback is 50 feet. The final revised <br />plans indicate the driveway to be set back 39 feet from the intersection, a two-foot improvement. <br />Staff recommends that the resolution approving the variance be amended to reflect the driveway <br />setback from the intersection of the County Road I and Greenfield Avenue right of ways. While <br />the basis of the hardship associaied with the property has already been articulated, staffwould <br />assert the following be identified as additional justification for the proposed amendment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.