My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� �: ; �: :�� �� � • �- �� _ - ,�.= �� �, `�_ <br />IVieeiir�g Da�e: <br />Stst�' 12epor-i by: <br />1'laaanea�g Case I�o. <br />I�eq�eest: <br />.�ppCican�: <br />Address: <br />PTl� #: <br />Zoneng/L.a�d CJse: <br />Lo� Si��: <br />Applic�ble Reg�als�tions: <br />e� <br />� <br />3anuary 6, i 999 <br />James Ericson, Planning Associate <br />545-98 <br />Accessory Buiiding Height Variance <br />Dan Gates <br />5364 Clifton Drive <br />OS-30-23-14-0042 <br />R-1, Single Family Residential <br />14,449 Square Feet (.24 acres} <br />Section 1125.02, Subd. 2 outlines the criteria to be used by the Pianning Commission in its <br />review of variances. <br />Sectian 1(06.03, Subd. Ic siates that na accessory building shall exceed 15 feet in heigh�. <br />Attaclame�is: <br />Planning Application <br />Zoning Map <br />Resolution No. 568-99 <br />�ackg�-ound: <br />The app(icant, Dan Gates, is requesting approval of a variance to permit his under-construction <br />�arage eo exceed the maximum heijht provision of 15 feet. The proposed height of the ;arage is <br />16 feet. The basis of the request is two-fold. The applicant would like the roof-line of the new <br />gara,�e to match the roof-line of the house, wI-iich has a fairly steep slope, The other reason for <br />the variance request, and the basis for the hardship, is that the City is requiring Mr. Gates' work <br />truck �o be parked within his garage or to have it removed from the property altogether. (His <br />work truck is a commerciai vehicle as defined by City Code and as sucl� is not ailowed to be <br />parked outside in a residential district.) Because the truck is too tall to fit within a typically sized <br />garaae, Mr. Gates needs to install an e[even�faot gara;e door, thu� raising the height of the <br />�roposed garage by ot�e foot. <br />On August 13, 1998, the app[icant obtained a building permit to expand his garage, which <br />invoived movin�,� the existing garage back approximately fourteen feet and constructing addi�ional <br />�araae space with a new door in the front, to matcl� the front [ine and roof line of the house. <br />:�fter having receivecf an anonymatas complaint abouT commercial vehicles parked at ttae <br />applicant's Itouse, stafi sent a leiter dated 9/4/98 which informed the applicant of the City Code <br />r�c�uirement prohibiting commercial vehicles from being parked autside in a residential district. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.