My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br />Gates Variance <br />Planning Case No. 545-98 <br />January b, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />c. That the specinl condiliotts or ci��crrnastances• do ��o[ restrlt from ihe actiai�s of lhe <br />applrcant. <br />While Mr. Gates is responsible for owning a vehic3e which does not conform to City <br />Code, he is attempting to correct Ehe situaiion by constructing a garage with a one-foot <br />variance in order to park the vehicle inside. <br />d. That grauting the va�iance requested will not confer on the applicant a�ty special <br />privrlege that is denred by lhis Title to owrrers uf other lands, strucltrres or btrildings in <br />Phe same district. <br />Granting this variance wi11 not confer on the applicant any special privilege, in that siaff <br />wouid instnici future applicants intent upon parlcing an oversize vehicfes within a garage <br />how to make such arrangements without the need for a variance. Because staff told NIr. <br />Crates that the truck would need to be removed after construction had aEready started an <br />the garage addition, staff cou(d not offer Mr. Gates this advice. <br />Thcrt the +�ariance regirested is lhe rrrinimz�n7 variance which woirld allevrcrte the hardship. <br />Eco��omic co�rditio�rs aloj7e shall ftpt bc corrsidered a harc�ship. <br />In order to reconfigure tf�e garage to allow for the truck to be pariced inside, the garage <br />doar will need to be made one-foot taller. Because of the added door height, the garage <br />in turn would become one foot taller. This is the minimum variance possible with keeping <br />the garage raof in line with the roof of #he home, <br />£ The variance woirld r2ot be maierially detj•imerrtal to the pzrrpose of this Title or to other <br />pt•op�rty rjr the sante zorle. <br />Granting this variance would not be detrimental to the purpose of the Zoning Cade or to <br />other properties in the neighbarhood. Many attached Dara�es have taller roofs to match <br />the roof-line of the home. The one-foot increase will be im perceivable to the general <br />public. <br />g. 1 he propo�•ec� va�•ia�ice tivrll �lot rmpair arr adeqr�ate strpply of light a��d air 10 CZLIrJLIC2/l1 <br />py�vperty oj� szrbslanticclly increcrs� the corrgestrarr of the pt�blic streets or increase the <br />c.�ange�• of frr�e or• ertdarlger the parblic safety or sirbsta�ltially drminish or impaij� property <br />vcrllres withij� the �teighhorhood <br />Tf�e rec�uested variance will not impair any neighboring properties' supply of liaht or air, it <br />. j will not create any additianal traf�ic impact nor wi[! it increase the danaer of fire or <br />endanger the public safety. There would not be any impact to property values in the <br />immediafie area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.