Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />:; <br />,__ .--- _ <; _ _ _ - <br />- � �-,�-�G^a.a� �z`�'J <br />� ,, ; �; :�` � .;, � �` �' ;�' <br />Mee�in� Datea <br />Staf�° l�epor°t by: <br />Plana�i�►� Case I�daa <br />Req�x�st: <br />Pe�itio�aero <br />Loc�tdon: <br />P�I Iv�s. <br />Zo►�dn�/L��►d �Tse: <br />Appi�cabie ltegula�ions: <br />� <br />. <br />_ __ o <br />- <br />-- <br />_ <br />Aprii 21, 1999 <br />James Ericson, Plan�ing Associate <br />547-99 <br />Conditional Use Permit for a Residential Dog I�ennel <br />Andrea. MacRannalds <br />2841 Bronson Drive <br />073023240002 <br />R-1, Single-Family IZesid�ntial / 5ing►e Famiiy Home <br />I�Iunicipal Code Section 701.03, Subdivisions l, 3, and I5, regarding the licensing of dogs <br />and operation of kennels. <br />Municipal Code �ection 1106.04, Subdivision 3, which requires�a conditionai use permit <br />for residential dog kennels in an R-1, Single Family Residential district. <br />Municipai Code Section 1125.01, Subdivision 3b, which identifies the criteria to be used <br />£or granting a conditional use permit. <br />Attach�aents: � • <br />2, <br />3, <br />4. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />Pianning Appiication <br />Zoning Map <br />500 Foot Map <br />License Application Form <br />Petition <br />Letter to the Agplicant, dated 2/R/99 <br />Letter to the Applicant, dated 3/4/99 <br />Resolution No. 577-99 <br />�ackground: <br />The applicant, Andrea MacRannolds of 2841 Bronson Drive, is applying for a conditional use <br />permit for a residential dog lcennel, a Code requirement far property owners with three or four <br />dogs. One of the licensing ret�uiremenis is that the property owner shall obtain signatures of <br />approval from more than 50 percent of the residents within 500 feet of the proper�y proposing the <br />kennel. The applicant was sent a map showing thase properties witlun 500 feet alon� with a <br />correspor►ding list of property owners/taxpayers. <br />This iiem had been scheduled for a public hearing �with the Planning Commission and City Council <br />earlier ihis year bui was puiled from the agenc�as when it was learned that {1) the a,pplicant was <br />aut of state and (2) she had not satisfied i�he minimum requirement for signatures needed for the <br />petition related to thi� rec�uest. Staff sent 4he applicant a. letter (attached) indicaiing its intent ta <br />exercise its right for an additional 60 days with which to raake a decision regarding this case. <br />;.. <br />