My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Macfdannolds CUP <br />Apri I 21, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br />As of the date ihis repari was drafted (April 15, 1999) the applicant had not yet submitted the <br />required signatures for this application, although she had ieft a voice mail message indicating that <br />she was working on getting the rest of the signatures. Because of the 120 day deadiine-_May g, <br />1999--the Planning Commission needs to act on this request at its April 17th meeting so that the <br />City Council can take final action on Apri126, 1999, the last.regular meeting before the deadline. <br />Anai�sis: <br />Lice�sin Re uirements: There are two critical requirements for a resideniial dog kennel license <br />to be approved, T1ne first is that the applicant shall obtain signatures of approval from at least fifty <br />percent of the property owners within 500 feet of ihe subject property. Tn this case, there are 57 <br />properties that either gall within or are partially within a 500-fooi radius a�2841 Bronson Drive, <br />which means that at a tninimum, 29 of the property awners would need to sign a petition in favor <br />of ihe kennel applicaiion. The applicani has thus far collected signatures approving of the kennel <br />request from six (6) property owners. <br />The other requirement is that the City Council would need to approve a conditional use permit for <br />tlais request. As with any conditional use permit, there are siandards and requireme�ts that need <br />to be addressed that concern the possible impacts of this use io the immediate area and <br />community as a whole. The individuai requirements vaill be addressed in the ne� sectio� of this �� <br />report. ... <br />Public Scr e.� Revrew: Staff has inquired with the Police Department regarding any calls or <br />cotnplaints associated with dogs at Ms. MacRannold's hotne. Since 1992, there have been four <br />incidents involving dogs: <br />� On November 30, 1992, a male Rottweiler was removed from the property after it had <br />reportedly attacked someone. <br />� Qn Octobar 10, 1994, the applicant was issued Administrative Offenses for having two <br />dogs {Rottweilers} withaut a license, both of which had been running loase through the <br />neighborhood. <br />° On March 19, 1998, a dog was removed from the subject property for not having a dog <br />lieense. <br />o On December 1, 1998, the applicant was issued a Citation for having more than two dogs <br />ai her property. <br />Adverse E ects: As r�vith all variance and conditionat use permit requests, the Pianning <br />Commission is charged with examining the possible adverse effects of the proposal. The City <br />Cod�, in �ection 1125.01, Subdivision 1, identifies five factors to be addressed. They are as <br />follows, wi�h respons�s in italics: <br />_ _ _ ____ <br />• ; , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.