My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MacRannolds CUI' <br />April 21, 1999 <br />Page 3 <br />2 <br />� <br />� <br />S. <br />� <br />i <br />Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Sirace the Corrzpf•ehensive Plan does not add�ess o� even Yefer to dog ownet•ship, it can be <br />asserted ihat--in ter�rr�s of the comp plan--there is not adverse effect. <br />The geographical area involved. <br />The area surrounding Phe subject property is zoned for and supports residential uses. <br />Dog ownership is a common feature in reszdential districts and as such, it tivould appear <br />that this request would �tot be inconsrstent with ihis geographzcal area. <br />Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciatie the area in which it is proposed. <br />It is nvt incofzceivable to assume that ppoperty values may be affected by this request, in <br />that with dog ow�rership comes added r•esponsibilities crnd maintenance, not to mention <br />the possibilrty of barking dogs and dogs running loase in the neighbo�•hood. To add to <br />this� �ossibilrty is the fact that the�e have been problems assocrated with dogs at this <br />address. <br />The character of the surrounding area. <br />Most of the homes in this area of the City are located on Zar�ger, deep lots with plenty of <br />yard space foY accessory buildings, homes, children, and pets. The char�acte�• of the <br />surrvzrrr�ing a�ea would not be affected by this r�equest. <br />The demonstrated need �or such a use. <br />This factor does not necessarily appZy in this case as dog ownership cannot be construed <br />as a respot�se to satisfy some unmet need. While clinical studies have shown there to be <br />�acrny positive health effects jor� those people who own pets, in terms of a"community <br />need ", it is not applicable. <br />Public Safety <br />As has beera pointea' out in the peport already, Phe possible adverse effect which r�ay <br />cause the �zost impact to the neighborhood and suprounding cornmunity is the threcat to <br />�ublic safety. TheYe have been four incidents logged with the Police Depa�tme�at since <br />1992, one involving an attack by a Rottweiler. <br />CLTY" Criieria' The following are the criteria that are listed in Section 1125.01, Subdivision 3 of <br />the 1Vl�xnicipal Code, pertaining to Conditional Use Permits, with responses addressing each in <br />italics: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.