Laserfiche WebLink
_. , ,, <br />: ; .., . ` `• . - . ` - =? ':` . _.. __ , . ... -- _. _. . . <br />I�Ioa��eis V�e� P�ann�n� Coar�enBSSflo� <br />l�e�u��ar Mte�i�� <br />Ape�a121, 1999 <br />Pa�e 3 <br />All af the dimensi�nal criieria associated w�th this reques�--se�backs, spacing between build'zngs, <br />width of proposed garage, and numbers of doors�-satisfy the requiremen#s as stated in Chapter <br />1104 of the Zoning Code. The proposed garage is about 91 feet from �he front p�operty line, 43 <br />feet from the rear property line, and is set back from the side of ihe property by ab�;�seven feet. <br />Taking into consideration the size of the shed, the total amount of acces��y buil��g coverage on <br />the lot would be 1,120 square feet, or 14.6 percent of the rea ard are� ;:��'�, �z� h� applicani io . <br />replace the existing shed with the largest aliowabte without , th� �rs�r�t �g� wauld rise to k� <br />16.4 ereent whtch is still less ihan the ma�mum access L` uilding c��r�����_�� i uuen�y perce�� <br />P� �� �.� ;� .. �:�, <br />Ericson reviewed the five CLTI' criteria as contained iz� �hc: �iiy C� <br />and sta.ff's analysis. He indicated this proposal appears �o �a�i�%� <br />Ericsan advised that staff has not received any advers� fe�c���k� �� <br />regarding this request. He then reviewed the criteria cor�t�n�d �n <br />grantin� a CUP and staf�'s analysis of each. He stated'"5;��ff �eI��s�i <br />this development proposai are minimal and are far out ��i�h�c� b} <br />that i� is desirable frorrz a community perspectiv� �t? k���F� p�t��e�Y <br />properties with building expansions since th f' opei-t��,s ar�, i��.� u <br />more ins�de storage being provzded and m�a' trigger ci�h� ��c���ti <br />== Ericson stated ihat s�aff recotm <br />resolution recommending appr� <br />2091 T�rrace Drive, requested <br />contained within the Code ��"�t <br />�� <br />uniforn� e���x�r�� appeara ��� � <br />�- <br />the indica���ti��}Ye �xist�ng ���t� <br />distances � ; „� :3, � <br />Ge�°a►d <br />Chair <br />nd � the <br />a � x ond <br />.�� <br />�' R rald M�� <br />�.: <br />ung to ov�ri <br />�€ng oive�i� <br />�ay �ave to���t� <br />1.. <br />r <br />" °��. <br />he l��i� riot <br />� �ection 17 �� fi� � ���i`�i" � <br />adverse eif�cf� ��L�uria. <br />i nei�hboring residenis <br />,Iaori 1125.01, Subd. 3b, for <br />h�t'�h� adverse effects oi <br />� b�zi�"i,�s. StafF also believes <br />�le�r� �mprove their <br />�l�zr-�e�t in beiter order.with <br />do the sarne. <br />�ng Corn�ission approve Resolution 578-99, a <br />�al Use •� 't for a 1,040 square faot garag� at <br />He r� ed the standard stipulations as <br />'�aC" es related to the use of the structure, <br />:>: <br />��i>tmproved surfaces or within the garage, and <br />rnoved to maintain the mir�imum six-foot setback <br />hin.� to add to the staff report. <br />afi 7:12 p.m. <br />.,:;>z ��, :.;. <br />C�, 'ssioner Miller in ;;';Jre�'�regarding the location of ihe small shed. Ericson advi�ed it is just <br />b�,;;.;_;,;d the garage, on t west side of #he properrty. Mi1ler asked if enough space will be allotted <br />�,cr t���ntain a sIx-foa�.,,�paration. Ericson stated it appears there e�vill be but staff will �heck to <br />���tdr���� �s prov '' ;��hen the bu�lding permit application i� received. I�iller asked if there will be <br />�, ��a�: �� i�, ,�i A'�of the garage. Mr. Miller stated h� is plannin� to have a singleasized garage <br />doo�, E�s�.��i��b cic �ithe garage. Miller s�ated the house is stuc�o and asked if the garage will also <br />be stucco. 1VIr. l�[iller a.dvised thai it vvil[ be vinyl sided anc� used primarily for storage, nc�t a home <br />o�cupation b�siness. <br />Tr��aring no iurther pubic input, Chair Peterson closed the public hearing at 7:14 p.m. <br />� <br />