Laserfiche WebLink
IVlounds �7eevw Plan�ar�g Commas�aorn <br />R,e��ctar I�eeg�n� <br />; <br />Ap�°i� 21, 1999 <br />Pa�e 4 <br />MQTION/S�.CUND: Jolu�son/�,aube io adapi Planning Commission Resolufion 578-99, a <br />resolution recommending approval oi a Conditional Use Permit �o allow for an oversized garage <br />at 2091 Terrace Drive, Mounds View Planning Case No. 552-99. <br />Miller requested the correction of several minor typographical errors. �'ri�son <br />corrections wi11 be made. <br />�.; <br />Ayes p � Nays - 0 ��; <br />, t <br />?'%T�.:: .tC?��O''' ` ` . <br />�/'�t �,. :,,:�� � <br />6o Ptar�r�ing Ca.se I�oe 551p99 F ��'�kb�ic $earin�) <br />Property rnvolved: 2814 Bronson ]�rive �� � <br />Coilsideration of'Planning Commission Resoiution 577��, a <br />of a Conditionat Use Pet-mit Request for a Residerit'ra� I3a,� K <br />Appiicant; �indrea MacRannolds, Property Ow�er :; , ,, <br />The applicant's son was present. <br />Planning Associate Ericson gave <br />The apphcar��, t�ndrea <br />pernut (CC.T�� �or a re; <br />four do�� €�n� t��'the <br />approvai irb� �,r��e �� <br />kennel. Tl�e a���can�. <br />This it ��iad been sc�ae <br />earli, 2's year but was <br />ou � state and Z she f <br />:� ; ) <br />p���t�on related to this �� <br />r����� ��a�- an additiona�� <br />5 0 p�: <br />s se�t <br />rep <br />these <br />carried <br />Denaczl <br />of 2��� ��q�s��,�rive, is applying for a conditional use <br />nnel, a�c�d�; s equirement for property owners with three or <br />r�inents �s'that the property owner shall obiain signatures of <br />��tk�e r�sidents within S00 feet of ihe property proposing the <br />3��c��ing those properties within SOd feet along with a <br />>�ta�payers. <br />�I�c�,�i�� J� public hearing with the Planning Commission and City Council <br />�L�II.�� �rom the agendas when it was learned that: 1} the applicant was <br />� no`t satisfied the minimum requirement for signatures needed for the <br />�uest. Staff sent the applicant a letter indicating it� intent to exercise its <br />da�rs with which to make a decision regarding this case. <br />�icsv���e�t���`�����°hat he jusi received the petitiion from the applicani's son before the meeting <br />toru��� ����<lras been unable to verify the signatures. Ericsan reviewed the four incidents <br />inv�Ivin� d��� at this address as indicated by the Poiics I�epartmeni. (7n November 30, I992, a <br />male Rattt�eiler vdas remov�d from the property a.fter ii had reportedly attacked someon�; on <br />October 10, 1994, the applicant was issued l�drninistrative Offenses for havin� two dogs <br />(Rottweiiers) wxthaut a license, boih of whiah h.ad been rut�ni�g loose through the neighborhood; <br />On l�/Tarch 19, 199$, a dag r�vas removed from the subject proper�y for not having a dog Iicense; <br />at�d on D�cember l, 1998, the applicant was issued a Ciiation for havin� more than twa dogs at <br />� <br />;: � <br />` -3 <br />