Laserfiche WebLink
> � �'< '; `;..... - . ::-' '� � .. .. . - � __. _ . . .._ ....__ -- - ._. _ . <br />,, <br />I <br />l�ot�nds �Ie��v Pla��in� C`or�r�xssron <br />Re�ular l�eet��tg <br />A�ri12�., 1999 <br />Page 5 <br />her properiy. %ricson clarified that the applicant has indica�ed that she called the police <br />department to remove the dog. <br />E�icson explained that because of the 120 day deadline--May 8, 1999--the <br />needs to act on tlus request so that the City Council can take final actio�<� <br /><: : <br />last regular meeting before the deadline. He explained that th ef%ci o�'�z <br />applicaiion is tfl have the application auiomatically approve. . � <br />;� , <br />,� <br />Ericson stated that gn consideration af ihe incidents in�o�� g ogs <br />commenis from the neighborhood, staff is recommendm� t�at the 3 <br />Resolation 577-99, a resolution recomm�nding denial o�� C'��� �'t <br />Macl�.annolds, locaied at 2841 Bronson Drive. He adv�sed ��.�i t�� <br />the meeting b�t her son is in at#endance tonight to answeX �«����t�x <br />Also, several residents are present who may wish to ac��ress this;�i� <br />I)avid NIa�Ra��olds, the applicant's son, stat� <br />of dog was involved in the attaclt and staf�s�� <br />�tottweiler. He stated ihey have lived at t_ o <br />knows that things happen. He explaine ,� < at a. <br />only one incident in ten years. Mr. � annol <br />askimg for a dog kennel to be built i� >` pro : <br />be buii�. He stated they cuzxentl ' ve Chre�� <br />Chair Pei�.���n opened <br />Phil Jo�n�� <br />50 percent <br />petition.be <br />the si�natta <br />� <br />but <br />;'6, 1999, the <br />on the <br />a dog kenn�l �r A.�idr�ea <br />�pplicant was u��able ia attend <br />tiith� i'lanning Commission. <br />� that it sh�uld'not matier whai type <br />�� .ha,�,�e indl�:ated it invol�ved a <br />�r��r� ��� everyone who has a dog <br />�� b�ti�breeder happens but that is <br />� <br />a loi at' people believe his mother is <br />�re indoor dogs and a kennel will not <br />one dog that is smailer than a cat. <br />>lat�t� ��ad; �tated fihat he is confused aboui the petition and whether <br />their ap�rt����l q� tlus request. Ericson explained staff just receive the <br />� tnr�;��,t�sn,th�v have been unable to verify the number and accuracy of <br />ti :� ; <� <br />Mr. ` son stiated a r�ur�l��r,��'neighborhood residents are present tonighfi and none were aware <br />�,,;; r • ;�, <br />th �� as a petition. H��at�d if they had been aware, none would have signed 'zt. Chatr <br />P�f;i'son explained the-.'S cedure for this type afpetition. <br />°; <br />r ,� ed there are 30 to 31 si atures on ihe etition and 29 signatures were <br />��i� ����anno�l � � P <br />i �qu�r�t� tc� �?�� l`50 percent. <br />< , � z �, <br />� �x�:�.�_,��:.�� , . <br />Mr, J �hnsor� stated he would think the imrriediate �eighboz's who lzve adjacent to ihe property <br />should have been asked about the petition, <br />Cons�anc� I,arson, 2�33 Bronson Drive, said she signed �he petition wit� understanding that tk►e <br />applicant would be fined �i00 per dog if they didn't sign the petition. She stated they do nat <br />mind the do�s but do ob�ect to the smeil sinc� the yard is not clea�ed up. NIs. Larson explained <br />