Laserfiche WebLink
;:— ,., ,.- _ ,:. _ . <br />1Vlm�nds Vae�nr Planne�ag Coma�ess�on <br />�e�ul�� I�Ileetfn� <br />Ap�°i121, 1999 <br />Pag� 7 <br />The appiicant was asked if�they were indoor or outdoar dogs. N�r. MacRannolds stated th�y let <br />the dogs outside to go to the bathroom and the Gr�at Dane and Gerrnan Shepard are pt�ppies so <br />they da like to run. � <br />Mr, MacRannolds explained that there is an area where the fence is by a,,.t�ll but. ��outd be <br />rectified with a higher fence. He stated his opinion that some eople assiat��� �.��tweilers are a <br />bad dog because of the bad press coverage they get and pe >' rget ��� ��c�d things about <br />, <br />them. °� � � , ,, ,, . <br />. �.,...� _ . . <br />Commissioner I�aden asked how old the dogs are. Mr. <br />seven years old and past her average life span, the �hih-� <br />12 years, the Great Dane is 14 months old, and German <br />years old. . , <br />11�r. I�acRanr�olds explained that his mother is at <br />year and usuaily takes two of the dogs wifh her � <br />�� <br />Ericson advised that staflf forwarded tt�s r�iuiion <br />Minnesota Siate Statutes classify Rottw .` rs as a`>� <br />this particular RottweFler rnay be a''� dog n <br />Statute does classify it as a"dang {��nima <br />_ �. <br />Cammissionex Kaden asked �i� <br />reapply if tk��'t�c��diiions� , � <br />making r��.��>la����ari sa i � ���ed. <br />can then retzp��y� �n seg�eral rr1c��#l' <br />� �: <br />., .:, <br />; <br />I�aden askec� wka�'� �i����eri� i� the <br />stated the ,�""Yi�al �t��trt�l`�i��e� <br />�< <br />dogs. <br />_: <br />�s stated th� ���.t�r��ier i;� <br />years old and -��F�Ii' ��u�'about <br />� y�ar and one�half to �wo <br />�� �c oper-tv �ti� ���u�six months out of the <br />; �r��ly,iwo at t�� re�tclence. <br />3>. y! <br />: �Y <br />��� ���� ��i:c��-�iey who commented that <br />gerai�s tt�tr�ial." He explained ihat vvhile <br />{ ...w <br />enci �� it� life span, he reiterated that the <br />iappens if theS �p���a�ion is denied and if the applicant can <br />Ericson �ta��d �l���Code requires a two-manth period before <br />� _;;.,. <br />�>.�he C;c�uric�I"tliev would have to remove two of ihe dogs an <br />is denied and they do not remove two dogs. Ericson <br />enforce the Code by forcefully renaoving two of the <br />sioner 7olinson a�lted` if ihere is a Code pertainzng to the height of a�ence for dogs. <br />siated there rs ,��. <br />? ' �� • �;� <br />%�rr�t���sraner -< t1d asked how long the applicant is given to compty. Ericson explained t e <br />����� <br />����,���jy� ���,� '�� in December and an agreemeni reached that they would make applica.iian so <br />th� t�i��`r���e' o comp�y is now. Ericson stated i.f ih� appiication is not approved by the Counc�l, <br />ihey �wil� rleed to immediately comply since there is no grace period and they have already <br />received a, period of four manths including a 60-day e7rtension. <br />A reside�t stated that the fence will gain nottun� except ia keep the dogs in on one side of the <br />yard hut it will not keep the st�nch out. I�e stated the neighbors cannot enjoy their own back yard <br />during the surnmer because of these dogs. <br />