Laserfiche WebLink
l�ou�d� V'gev� Planni�� C�mmessio� Aps°i121, 1999 <br />�.8eg�la� I�Ieeton� Page S <br />: '� <br />1VI�'. Johnson sta�ed that the smell is not a. probletn with his lot but Yhe barking is a problecn and <br />there zs no fence in the front yard. He stated ihat he does not think there should be four dogs in a <br />reside��tial r�eighborhood and noted tha� one dog has aIready chased �us wife when she was out for <br />a walk, ,�� <br />Chair Peterson explained thafi these a.ppiications occur due to <br />dog owner becomes aware of°the �eed for a license. When -:. <br />are researched and, generally, the only problem that is us :.' <br />that comp�aints of dogs runnin� at-large and odor have nb � be <br />the r�corr�mendaiion is for denial �arith the Council maki�i� �i�e <br />exptained ihe Planrung Cornmission will have io consider �Il;� <br />recommendation to the CounciL `',�, `.::'' <br />NIr. M�cRannolds asked �f the petition of signatures is <br />that since staiihas not been a.ble to verifry the Iocai�ot�; <br />apprav�d on that basis alone. He stated that pr�c�t �t� ,� <br />verified by staffto see a�'this requirement is r,�a�i} _ <br />>Ia�t £�`t�m-�'nezghbor oz the <br />ca��i�t� �� �ri��ie, complaints <br />as ��c� a�`��.t�i���. �ie note <br />,,,�, <br />�cin cot�,���,i�t�,�tai �if >:c <br />�' . _. s . . _ .,r;:�'�'cZ,F � <br />input and <br />onst�i�� e� �hair Peterson explained <br />�,; <br />si�na���'e� �t� �tumber, it cannot be <br />1 considc��t�€�zr�`�this p�tition couid be <br />IVIr. Sutlivan stated the petition cannot b iven w�it sm�� z� ��pears it was obtained by telling <br />peopie that they would be fined if th `dn't ob4` n"X" nu bei of signatures. He stated that he <br />4x. <br />believes the petition should not ca ;.,�;�, w�t��: <br />�w�� � <br />Mr. MacRaru�oids stated the �n� rriay have ��n`r�;��r��zaned to a couple of people but the more <br />recent sigta��ure� on the se�p�e� p�Ue �were �c�x �c���;t�f�a fine. <br />COri1tT11S51�P <br />street nam�. <br />�T� <br />af <br />th� names on th� petition have no house number, only a <br />neighbar and didn't even see the petition: <br />�terson noied that c��a� �ddress on the petition is outside of �he distance criieria but some . <br />thers are fairly ci` `�e �to the hotne, some immadiately adjacent. He asked if there is a <br />Zent on the ian `ge used an such a petition. Ericson stated that staf�typically prepares <br />ion and pro� <�s ii to the applicant ta use during the signature gathering process, He <br />�at a pet�t�, ' as drafted for and given to this applicant but rnay have been misplac�d. <br />i (CY'f�i.� <br />�-e����� e typical language used and staied the petition presented tonight is noY in the <br />�I������b� City staff. <br />Cha.ir Peterson stated since it is not in tha fonn of petition usu�lly �sed by the City and not yet <br />verifi�d, he does not believ� the petiiion ca,n be co�sidered tonight. <br />.J <br />