My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I � <br />: °i �-'� 0' � � :; . �:f,', ). ' � �; � ��,- ., ; � , y� . � �i �, ;�: : <br />Do not list uses as conditional uses in a district if you believe it is generally unacceptabie there. <br />Remember the question about the right io ihe use is basically off the table. It is a matter of how <br />the use may be modified, or its adverse characteris�ics may be mitigated. <br />I - °• � : .�• '; <br />The coucts have made it very clear that there must be a direct connection or ne�cus between the <br />problem and the cure. If you have reviewed evidence that suggests that a fast food restaurant <br />with a drive through window witl have up to eight vehicles stacked waiting for food during peak <br />periods, it is acceptable to conditian the pemiit to require space for eight vehicles io stack on site. <br />It is not acceptable to use the fact thai a use is tisted as conditional to require architecturai design <br />features, building materials or landscaping that is not required generaliy in your ordinance, or to <br />restrict its sign �rea to less than the amount avai(able to other uses in the district. <br />... U�. '. �� � .'�.;, : '�; 1,. ; ,t, .:..: <br />■ <br />Another rarnpani abu�e is the attachment of time Iimitations to CUPs. The only permit that can <br />legally be attached a�ime limit or "sunset pravision" is an interim use �ermit. Conditional use <br />permits are land use permits that run with the Iand. They cannot be autoznatically revoked when a <br />particular applicatat sells, or a specific time period elapses. <br />"' ; , , `, � , ' 1, •. 1 1; . ; .�; ., '., `; . �.: ... <br />There is nothing wrong with the idea of scheduling annual or biannual reviews of CUPs (or other <br />time interval of your choosing}, but, understand that this is simply an administrative convention <br />that you have established. `Iou cannot require an applicant to renew his/her permit at a prescribed <br />time. <br />You can at virtually any poini, based upon evidence or even concern that condi�ions are not being <br />met, provide legal notice and hald a public hearing to review � Ci7�. If there is suf�icient <br />evidence of serious vioiaiions, you may have grounds to revoke a CLTP. <br />�, 1 � i <br />Conditional uses are pemutted uses to which reasonable conditions may be attached. The need <br />for these conditions must be supported by evidence in the record. As part af your community's <br />planning and zoning administration program you may decide to conduci periodic reviews of <br />CUPs. �owever, CUPs are land use permits that run with fihe land, not the land owner or <br />applicar►t and as lon� as the conditions are bein� met, the permit remains vaiid. <br />0 <br />. <br />... , _. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.