1999 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

i - i IVloureds �Iiew p[ar�s�ist� �oe�naissdon �tegaala� IVleetin� IVi�y 19, 1999 Page 2 Comm�ssioner�Miller stated that the minutes had been reviewed at the last meeting, and a few very minor corrections had been made. MOTION/SECOND: Miller/Hegland to approve the April 2 i, 1999 Ayes — 6 Nays � 0 5o Planrs°sn� Ca�e I�o. 553-99 Proper�y Involved: 7386 Parkview Terrace Consideratian af a variance request for a reduced side Applicant: litike & Sandy Leon The applicant was present. Planning Associate Ericson gave the The applicants, Mi}ce and Sandy J setback established for principaI e�sting 10 x�J 2 square fooi �� The deck _w�,�-i�>h;�� pV;�rP�r'�;:;�,r ire as corrected. on carried. blfc � three-season porch a�°e requ��ng a var��e from the required ten-foot side yard ings ar�c�z �„ing s�� therein. They would like to replace and �� h a thre� se�ason:�orch of the sarne size in the same location, onstru��qz� ��e }�ause, is five feet from the north side of the wo foot side yard setback. The subject prc��z�y ��; ��caled ir� ih� �aiv�r Lake Woods single fari�ily home development at the northeast cot-r��x ��'� ��,y �,�aad �'� �rzd Silver Lake Road. The home, which faces east, is one of ��: many in t'�developin�nt th�fi la�ve a street at the front (Parkview Terrace) and back (Silver Lake Road) :^ e property. �7`kt� �tit �e of this property is only 9,150 square feet. � � E,� n noted for the Pl ��ing\Commission to act iavorably on a variance application, the Planning ��4�rimission must ftnd •, emonstrated hardship or practical difficulty associated with the property �h�� nakes a literal �� erpretation of the Code overly burdensome or even restrictive to a property �E�'rt�x State sl�;��ies require that ihe governing bod� review a set of specified criteria for each ai��t�� C3 triake its decision in accordance with these criteria as set forth in Section 1� 25.02, �u�l��t��'�,�ofthe City Cade. He noted the Code cleariy states that a hardship exists when a!1 of the criteria are met, Ericson noted this tot was approved in 19�5 as part of the 5iiver Lake Woods Second Addition subdivision and in conj�nc�ior� with the Siiver Lake V1loods PIanned Unit Deveiopment (PUI�) agreemeng. 1741hile density bonuses and i•eductions in frontage requirements wer� given �o �he - i;