My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2012 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
988
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�) <br />; <br />! ::.. I " ��.: <br />i <br />_ _ _ � '" <br />Mo�nds �1i��r Plaa��i�g �o�remiss°ron <br />Itegt�lar I�eetae�g <br />��y 19, 1999 <br />�age 3 <br />nt to altow for substandard iots, no mention is ntiade in the documentation aboufi allowance <br />developme <br />£or reduced setbacks. � <br />'ewed the seven criteria which must be considered anP,an�ed <br />� - 1 ' it <br />Encson rev� <br />appears to staff thai in this �� areaes substandardh� (Thetlot t> �'���=�eet vv <br />into consideration that the l0 000 sqt <br />a �'� � . . <br />area of 9,150 square feet, substantiatly less than the re u�r ��� � , <br />width oithe praperty, at 75 feet, does comply with the Cod�, ax►d lt �s �� <br />depth or area, which is basis for this variance. <br />�r��� <br />Ericson outlined the criteria as foliows: <br />a. <br />L�7 <br />Exceptfonal oY extraordinary circumstances <br />geneYally to othe� properties in the sarne �onc� <br />topography or othe� ci�cumstances over w�azc�i <br />date lze�eof have had no control. ���� <br />Ericson stated that he could <br />The literal interpretation <br />comm..only enjoyed b,�� a <br />: uch ana ysis, <br />on were to take <br />�, �vhich do not apply <br />�rnm lot size or shape, <br />t�eYty since the effective <br />mstances applicable to this <br />�e would deprrve the applrcant of rights <br />district under the terms of this Title. <br />►tei-pretation of the Code would not prohibit the property <br />'st could aniy be 7 feet in depth. <br />do not res7rlt fram the actions of the applicant. <br />request is the result of the applicant's desire to construct a <br />"= , <br />araance reqirested will not confer o� t�e �upes ortbui d'ngs�inl�he s me <br />this Title to olvners of other lands, stru <br />�. , , < .> <br />�X �y . sl <br />u�F :� <br />z ,.' <br />but not a �rope <br />��'z���i stated that three-season porchesHe tat d that;this 'is a desirabie improvement, and <br />oyaners ha�e room to accornmodate them. roved variances to allow for iiving space <br />that i� the past, the Planning Commission has apP <br />' ions. He staied that staff should determine whether or not this particular prape�y met <br />cond�t <br />the same criteria as pasi properties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.