Laserfiche WebLink
1�Iounds Vie�v Plareni�g Coin�is�ion <br />l�eg�la�° IVleeteng <br />Ju�� 2, 1999 <br />Page 5 <br />stated that all four ur�its would have to exit #he property in reverse, wluch could be a safety concern. <br />He stated that these issues would be addressed a�id sfiaff believed there were means to resoive them. <br />Ericson t•eferred to the Certificate af Survey, on-site plans, and a grap <br />areas of the Woodlawn Terrace Apartment complex encroac :; upon tl <br />southern end, toward Woodlawn Drive. He stated that Wo �_'� ��,;� Teri <br />, �� .�� <br />1ot cross the lot line, which is in violation of the City Co� _�� ��e stated <br />with the owner of the apartxnent complex to discuss this a�;��other issue; <br />of the four-plex. �� _ � <br />Ericson stated thai there were water and sewer lines in UJ <br />the site. Thexe are ten-foot drainage and utility easemer <br />which will more than likeIy serve as drainage areas foi�� <br />be consulting with th� City Attorney regarding a�ive�fn <br />along the east lot line between the two vacant prca�erties #r <br />that the Cit t icall re uires that an ease � <br />Y Yp Y q �n 'f�l�e d�d� <br />easement would no� be privately owned-� reta�i���i l <br />deveioper could be required to maint � the ea ' eni <br />discussion with the City At�orney. _ <br />Ericson summarized the issue <br />of the development review,fc <br />� <br />Mike J�i�i� �, appiic;�cnt, statc� <br />stipulation a�tl�c Rcsolution. <br />Commissioner����lanc� a5k�d <br />northern : , �t unzt. `� . � �` <br />1VIi � uaire stated that �t w�s; <br />� ;.. <br />cQ ;`,. ` of the site, but th,�la� <br />to tti�rr lease. <br />it'tl�e <br />.ting thai two <br />°rty, near the <br />- and parlcing <br />�4. <br />d be meet' ``� <br />dl�wri i�rive so utilities are avaiiable to <br />ori il�e �ropert��'s north and west sides <br />de� elppinent`„��e stated that l�e would <br />side yar�,ciraina�� and utility easexnent <br />rovicte for additic�i�al drainage. He stated <br />te� %r th���,'purpose. He noted that the <br />t�e Citv ��; � Ie stated, however, that the <br />ic� :th�t tliis would be addressed in his <br />a resolution recommending approval <br />subri�itted the site plan chan�es as set forth in the second <br />contained anything to address the parlcing situation on the <br />�iy intention to create two additional paricing spaces in the northeast <br />had not yet been redxawn. <br />��stated Y1ie end parking spaces will eliminate the back out movement. He <br />isidering putting up signs and striping a no-parking zone in an attempt to <br />of congestion. They will also have separate operatin� procedures as an adjunct <br />Coriunissioner Miller asked about the compositian of the exterior of the buiiding. Mike 3uaire stated <br />that it was caza�prised of maintenanc�-free siding and steel doors. <br />Chair Peterson aslced if the building location on the lot could be adjusted. <br />