Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />li�oune�s V�ev+� PI��araira� Co�xrn�ssior� <br />�teguiar I�eeting <br />.�ua�e 291999 <br />Pag� 6 <br />Ericson stated that it could not, but the l�uilding itseif cauld be wider, explainzng that there was a 20 <br />foot setback to the west. He stated, however, that ihis would not increase the function of the paricing <br />area or the building itself. �" <br />��.,. <br />� <br />�� �� <br />Chair Peterson asked if there were plans to develop the second�lot in ihe iu'ture Ivlike Juaire stated <br />they were preparing paperwork which would be submit shQ� � <br />A �� <br />Ericson stated that the lot was relatively flat but with a c <br />providing channels and swafes, and given the sandy con <br />the property would drain but may result in standing wa <br />�unds Vie��v SUils,;he.li�1'ie <br />period of tinie (�ti hour). <br />__ <br />Commissioner Kaden asked about the exterior lighting�VV�ii"ch, Iie n�t��i; was ilot indicated in the <br />building plan revision. Mi%e Juaire stated that there was �xistin�'cxfet�io� 1ig1��i�1g for each entryway, <br />and that floodiighting was planned for the bacic of il��'siructure � <br />{ <br />Ericson stated that plan will need to be sub �c1 prio� ta Cc�uncil cot�sideY•afion. <br />� � : ":� <br />�� l i : <br />Coxxuxaissioner Braathen requested clarif��ation of�,ow thcy �lann�,d�io d'rvert the water tun-off. He <br />asked if it would drain onto County,��,��d I, and���'so, where�from that point. <br />Ericson stated that the driveway <br />diverted fronx the existing b�ilcii, <br />��., <br />and that ,�. �a�cir; �ortion cif ,5�c�r <br />��. <br />stated lchat`�Ze 1x�d spqlcen to Ft�3�1 <br />oftheten �iictitiz•ai��a�?e nia�e��ve <br />planried t�;ap'�ace a par <br />stated that <br />�� <br />;� ld be b�i ��t,� to i���.�f the water to remain on the property, or <br />to the v�e t~�,��e; �d that the voiume of run-off was mirumal <br />� � �.`,� �.. � <br />��-ater w ul��� absorbed before reaching County Raad I. He <br />4�Ioxlcs Director Ulrieh who agreed, and stated that the utilization <br />i, �ut�iciently accommodate the run-ofF. <br />;'� <br />..:. <br />i�'i�vas allowed on Woodlawn Drive. He stated that the appiicant <br />� the souih side, and asked if there would be room for visitor <br />parking was restricted on one side of Woodlawn Drive. <br />siated th�at �pplicant was required to provide only 2.5 parking spaces per unit, and was <br />as�d i� ����ide visitor parking. He agreed this level of parking may noi be sufficient for an <br />us�.�v�nt but visitors could park on the street prior to 2 a.m. <br />Commissianer Stevenson stated that he is not satisfied with ihe landscaping plan and would lilce the <br />site plan reviewed by the City Forester for additional piantings and landscaping design. He stated <br />that it should be specified that some of the gr�en area on the site �ian contain plantings. <br />