Laserfiche WebLink
,; <br />1V���nds Vie�v Planr►in� Cotnrr►a�s�ori <br />Reg�a��r I�eetin� <br />�ua�e 2,1999 <br />Pag� � <br />Kaden asked who would pay for the drainage improvements. Ericson stated that the applicant would <br />be responsible for the cost of the improvements, and possibly the other in�proved pro�erty owners. <br />Chair Peterson asked about the warranty for the drainage plan. Ericson ��ied tli���`�Ehere would be <br />� ,�, <br />a warranty period to cover repairs should they be needed. In the future,�x ��i'rs vi�buld be the City's <br />responsibility which, in his opinion, would be desirable to,���te ownerSliip .\>, <br />�.,. <br />Miiler asked about entrances for emergency vehicles. : <br />and vehicles could ingress and e�ress wiihout difficulty. <br />to insure access. Miiler asked where the fire hydrant <br />located at the sou#hern corner of the lot. <br />Hegland aslced why there appeared to be a rush to <br />he had been working with the applicant for two m <br />to the developer that ihey would be required to �; <br />was attempting ta rminimize the impact to th���; <br />�� <br />added that if the Planning Commission ��s not <br />time, they cpuld hold the matter over ur�i��� the ne <br />Kaden aslced what guarantees the <br />recommendation to the City Cou <br />staff would l�rin� it forward=��,.t1� <br />Heglanc�`�� <br />add�tional <br />Braathen re u�� <br />2 of the R rv�iYuti <br />City _ ineer." <br />�equested the <br />tl� <br />it the lots wcre sniall �.iiough <br />Bill Juaire sta�ec�'�tliat it was <br />this a�pliv��iioz�;., F,ricson explained that <br />ring which tit�nc,it;was not made lcnown <br />ce,ihe City`�`ouu�il. He stated that staff <br />fc�,`no� add��ssing the matteY ea7rlier. He <br />ble��wiil�;adontin� the Resolution at this <br />;��i��inents�'ouid be m� if the Planning CQmmission made their <br />� to appxavc ,.hric ,o'��tatect that if the conditions were not met, <br />�:� <br />next Counc.il`rneetz�i� and recammend deniai. <br />2.e, to address revisions to the parking Iot and providing <br />ic� language regarding the drainage plaii. Ericson staied that Page <br />.e finai drainage plan will be submitted and wili be approved by the <br />" in Item 4 of the Resolution be omitted. <br />if th�: �uage pertaining to the landscaping was suffzcient. Ericson stated that staff <br />�� Q <br />�-tli� Jai�guage based upon the discussion, but he believed it was sufficient. <br />Cha�r�p�terso�n requ�sted that Condition 1 of ihe Resolution include the statement "approved by City <br />staff and the City Forester." <br />Hegland r�quested the addition on the plan of standard, to�scale, vehicle autlines to indicate the <br />amount of room available in th� parking spaces. Ericson s�ated staff wiil assure parlcing spaces are <br />in accordance with the City Code. <br />;� <br />