|
_ ___ ___ _ . . --. — --- . ----- ' � � ---" '-- - �` .�'£ � �.r-: _.�... rr_< ___-___ «�� -�' - �^�`'�� .sr_.�—�� __� _ F_�' _-'�
<br />�
<br />I
<br />I
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 2, 2000
<br />Regular Meeting Page 4
<br />Community Development Director Jopke stated the Planning Commissio
<br />each year, at the first regular meeting in February, the Planning �;cr�x►missic
<br />the Bylaws, and make any changes they feel are necessary, il� �t��3ic,ated st�
<br />of the Bylaws for the Commission's review. ,,
<br />Chairperson Peterson stated the Planning Commission h�.d ���.de �
<br />previous year, primarily to eliminate procedural difficulti� ar� ����s��zs
<br />operations within the year, and in this sense, many improvei�r��,��� �a�
<br />this year, the Planning Commission has undergone a chang� �i�;��� e°��
<br />meetings. He explained that two meetings prior, the C�'tnmissiora �
<br />necessary to amend the format of their agenda, as rhe only di�f'erern
<br />meeting is broadcast, rather than only the formaL ��cs���i�;� �:� the in
<br />Bylaws should be amended to reflect this change ,
<br />��o� �€����y�r� �I9�; "�$ylaws made any reference
<br />ing �o�r=.�'}��� ;i�a�� would care to incorporate
<br />n the �c��_���ci1 ���,�ion in this regard.
<br />icate that
<br />to review
<br />a copy
<br />�,�:,
<br />6:��
<br />�
<br />�rumber of cor�-r.�;�i���� ���;
<br />of the schedul�: o�":��:,� ��in.
<br />�; ,riade. He indicated that
<br />��c� ,to the broadcasting of
<br />�a��7�l1� decided it was not
<br />M r�c�j�.Xc� �� �hat the entire
<br />c;��a�;. ; �� inquired if the
<br />Community Development Director Jopke st�t�d he
<br />to the televising of ineetings. He inquirecl; if the Pl
<br />this into the Bylaws, or if they would .pr��`�r to relX;:
<br />Commissioner Stevenson stated t
<br />mention of anything relatec� tc� th�
<br />to sop���r}�Et� fr�quent chc����. '
<br />frequc:��, +;��;r,iz�;;:; tl�erefc��'�; l�Q �
<br />Chair���� c�ri �.°'; �.�4,ox� sY�?iE;�� ��E� h�
<br />Commissior���°� ���1[rr�`
<br />". . . secretary �i � �}�; ���
<br />which ir�s�i�ates, ,.` �'1�e
<br />City C[iuncil for acti
<br />, .,
<br />wh�r�m the Council
<br />zxie�tin� would occur
<br />igend�. ����ion would�;t, e a more appropriate place to make
<br />Y::>: .
<br />;vising a�`�7�;�ri��;s, � rt is for the minutes which are subject
<br />pointecl '�,i�� i6��� tl�e broadcast policy was also subject to
<br />rather n�'r ge�`i:l�is as a complete addendum to the Bylaws.
<br />� i��n'` I�i��, �!; ��icers: Subparagraph A, last sentence, should indicate
<br />yion ior �.F��; ��urpose..." She noted Subparagraph B, first paragraph,
<br />�a� ihe }�erson recommended for chairperson shall be forwarded to the
<br />,.� �Crst meeting in January." She inquired if a situation might arise
<br />i�old`' their first meeting on Monday, and the Planning Commission
<br />c�r�ving Wednesday.
<br />�"t��:�.rperson Petersn� �stated the Planning Commission had discussed this the previous year, and
<br />E,�{e �?�'�a;�os�r�, lz��age to address this possibility, however, he had not seen any provision for this
<br />-s� ���r, ���,r�<��J�?,�.' �Te pointed out that if the first Council Meeting were to occur prior to the first
<br />�''� ���E����;� ;��y:nrnission meeting, this recommendation could not come forward to the Council until
<br />theiY- second meeting in January.
<br />Commissioner Laube suggested the language be amended to indicate ". .. at its second meeting in
<br />January," and omit the word "first".
<br />
|