|
_
<br />" - - ; _ ;
<br />�------ - =-=-= --�=-------- , -__ . , , �. _,��_____� �--- ---�---- -� _-- -- --_------ _- --
<br />� .
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 2, 2000
<br />, Regular Meeting Page 6
<br />Chairperson Peterson agreed, adding that this could prevent a particular pr
<br />perception of railroading or heavy-handedness, and although it was hoped
<br />impression the Commission would ever put forward, he couid;,s�e the p
<br />procedure.
<br />Chairperson Peterson stated the previous year, he had no1
<br />be unable to attend the meeting, however, for some rea�
<br />the following day. He noted a similar situation two wee
<br />had been unaware that the Planning Commission meeting
<br />upon coming to City Hall. He pointed out that the Byla
<br />notified of such occurrences by telephone. He commentf
<br />notification practices have been utilized, however, in tr
<br />down.
<br />Community Development Director Jopke
<br />Commissioner regarding the meeting cance�;
<br />�_:,�
<br />Peterson. :._�,�
<br />in t�r�s of any
<br />liG,: '�as not the
<br />� +;�_llowing this
<br />City staff;�ii� E-;ra�f'i
<br />aas messa'�e was noc
<br />haf: tti
<br />situati
<br />ned....iha�._ h�: ;hac�
<br />a snowstor�n��, �`v�;?����������Y�e
<br />and only learned of this
<br />>�ommissioners shall be
<br />,x., � vari�ty of different
<br />���'c�� c ��,�� �-P had broken
<br />npted to call each
<br />�age for Chairperson
<br />Commissioner Miller indicated that.,t�� 1?age 5 o�'fhe Bylaws;;:�ast paragraph, last sentence, refers
<br />to a"revised meeting schedule..',.;x;,<;:;;;She requ�5ted clarifi,r�tion, pointing out that the Planning
<br />. fvy' : . ':'�:`N
<br />Commission's meeting schc d��lc lia�'been pre����s�y �ppr�:ved.
<br />Comrr�E�a�aty ���;velo�menl �"�����;��a�' Jopke sta��c� t��i� entire sentence appeared to pertain to the
<br />Plannit�� �.��k���y�.s�;ion's 199� �������rz� schedule, and suggested it be stricken from the Bylaws.
<br />%OITII]115�1();i4',$` �i��3PA��0Y1 �I.?!�f',(? ���' `�!',�TC��'.�...
<br />�rson ���z°sr��x �.�� �:�ci. ��c ��p�airied out that current practice provides that the meeting
<br />l� �� establa�i��*�i �.,�' ,���uary, and the review of the Bylaws takes place in February,
<br />�;•:f�� �� .
<br />�`e; the situatiox� �€�����;�`� �t��h meeting schedules are incorporated into the same resolution
<br />not reoccur. °
<br />ssioner Miller a,C1��ised that that the top of the first page of the Bylaws should indicate
<br />;d March 2, 2Q1�?:"
<br />i�����,� ��;��T/�F��: Stevenson/Laube. To Approve the Bylaws, as Amended, and Item No. 4,
<br />`���1����a,���������;;t�;��Last Sentence, Indicate "...secretary for the Commission for the purpose...",
<br />���z��r��� �g;s°���i�l B Indicate "At its first meeting in January, the Commission shall conduct an
<br />election in order to make its recommendation of a chairperson. The name of the person
<br />recommended for chairperson shall be forwarded to the City Council at its ne� meeting in
<br />January. Based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the Mayor, with the
<br />approval of the City Council shall appoint...", the Last Sentence, on Page 5, Last Paragraph, be
<br />Stricken, and that the First Page of the Bylaws Indicate "Revised March 2, 2000."
<br />
|