2000 Planning Commission Packets

Home Browse Search

_ _. � - Mounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999 Regular Meeting Page 3 Planning Associate Ericson stated the general requirements considered for a Conditional Use Pernut are outlined in the Staff Report. He advised that the specific requirements indicate the front yard depth shall be a minimum of thirty-five feet, and this provision is met. He stated another requirement provides that sideyards shall be no less than thirty feet, and staff believes this provision to be met as well, however, there is an accessory building on the site which encroaches into the sideyard setback, s::<:: � and is located 20 feet from the property line. He explained that staff interprets t��'"provision to address the Church structure, itself, and not any accessory structure f' Planning Associate Ericson noted a specific requirement than one acre. He explained the site is approximately E wetlands and upland woods. He indicated that adequate sc landscaping is provided, particularly with the presence o�' the mature trees and landscaping on the site. Pla.nnulg Associate Ericson stated there is a requirement is provided. He indicated there are 98 parking stalls on t facility, as well as for the expansion, according to the �� seating in the worship area might be made av��;i��bl�, �� additional parking to be provided. He poittlt�d o�ai. Rl ta additional parking if it is determined to be�=�;i�cessaryx ' Planning Associate Ericson explai service entrances is not applicable; provisions of Section 1125 O1 c�f pertain to th� adverse af�� r��;� Permit _r��;��;: �Y�d that ;�:�jt ��.a�; three stY�eeis, '; from neighbo this a, w ini�rtua� ��.��_F�:F�:�� 3hall be no �� and th� �v� to t� o� �� :rlang and access to the site site, wj�4c;fa �1��°�;; t:he need for the existing �d�. I'1� Y��c c� �1�� additional temporary r9:2x;;r, staff belte�`�s this does not warrant �, ��;' ��;z��i�r��'� room on the site to create �ion perta�;':ni�rig �o adequate off street loading and �osal. I��:��dvised there us a requirement that the �;:<:::� ode az� rnet. He explained that these provisions ��c�difionally reviewed with the Conditional Use �s no ��f��.�fi<�'�� ects are presented with this use, or with the '��; ir�c�icatied with the location of the site, which is adjacent to ��I��zci� and wetlands, the proposed use is sufficiently separated Planning ��ociatc Ls-i�scs�� lained that with the second part of this request, the Development Reviev��here are dim��asp�,�� °equirements that must be met. He advised that all of these „ > req��i��ments have bee� �� {��i�l�. the exception of the parking lot setback on the west side of the prc�p�rty, along Long Lai��; Road. He provided the Commission with the site plan, which indicates tl��t� �� parking lot is a�t�'roximately two feet from the property line. He explained, however, even ,S��hat all the requirements are met, in that no alterations to the parking lot are �ed that the parking lot represents a non-conforming situation, and unless the sing to redo the parking lot, it should be allowed to remain. P1ar�r�iYig As�ociate Ericson advised that with the expansion, the applicant would be required to provide 92 parking stalls, and at present there are 98 parking stalls on the site. He pointed out that if the Planning Commission desires to consider the potential 48 additional temporary seats, as indicated on the site plan, an additional twelve stalls would be required. He explained that if that were the case, there would be a shortage of six parking stalls on site. He stated there is adequate