|
�- ���-r_:.r `�� ; _'`�I • � � ,.__.� :-��, :. �S E r'_..�: � ; �r _ � . . _ _ _ . �,.-t, �:' � - - - . F . .
<br />_ . �_ � . . ,. . _ _ _. _
<br />'-'_- .v., ., _�.:,_-. --_... . . -: -_ . �. .. ,. . - -
<br />'I . " � - -- - � .._..
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission November 1'7, 1999
<br />Regular Meeting Page 4
<br />space to provide the additional six parking stalls, and if the Planning Corrunission wishes to enforce
<br />that, staff recommends the site plan be redrawn to indicate proof of parking, rather than an actual
<br />requirement that the developer provide the six stalls.
<br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated staff feels a shortage of parking on the site _would be self
<br />�.::.
<br />correcting, in that the congregation would certainly inform the Church., if addit��?�al parking is
<br />necessary. He stated staff recommends the Commission allow the parki��, 'r.o ��ain as it is. He
<br />explained that at some point in the future, if the temporary seattng beGar��b, ���� r�aax�ent, the parking
<br />requirements can be revisited through the Conditional Use Peri�t�� �vhich car.� �� ���i���,w�d by the Cit,y=
<br />at any time. ' A �<k,.�•
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated that in regard to the ws
<br />will be more than 100 feet from the wetland, and as suc
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated there are no plans
<br />landscaping will be provided. He stated that staff has c
<br />adequate, and the representatives of the Church ha��; i�;
<br />landscaping that will be removed with this expansic�t� �r�jt
<br />site, and the care of the existin landsca in �x ��
<br />g p �x��taff b�t��
<br />detailed landscape plan. � `'��''
<br />i`�:a"Y /.>S:`4i'�
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated
<br />which typically require discussion.:
<br />therefore, there is no need to revz�'
<br />of Long Lak� Road, and tii�F;� z i� r��
<br />stated �ti�z� ���;; two aG���y� ���ii
<br />drive aisles ��� �����sa�<,'f� ouf, h�
<br />recommendin�; ����� �;��{�r��s 1��;
<br />Planning A�ociat� �ric� ���� ��ie.�i
<br />impact� ��i`this use are mc:�, �€�t�
<br />and,��ect staff to draft � �•����
<br />s:;:<><:
<br />no,,���►tstanding issues v�rifi� ih:
<br />Gtiut�,cil is warranted. ��
<br />0
<br />ed
<br />n i�'e"site, all conG t�°�a�;��o�� ��tiivities
<br />?��r permits woul�l �� r�quired.
<br />��t� �`���� �:?ndscaping, yet additional
<br />cl p���t ���r:'��;��.r�r�scaping on the site is
<br />�h�y ����r;�1�p zr,�����replace the trees and
<br />addec� r��r�[; g;iven the history on the
<br />ar�ul�a x�c�f be necessary to require a
<br />�:;L �
<br />f`.�,
<br />k���A�� are ot��r`�cons�der�tions with the Development Review,
<br />G.�
<br />��'�explai�j� ihere are.�:rio plans to alter the lighting on the lot,
<br />this prc���sion. H;e'��tdicated access to the Church is taken off
<br />other �.��;��� �ec�� County Road I or from Bronson Drive. He
<br />on L����� �, �}Ii� Road, and if the parking area were ever
<br />�, a�7c� ��te���i�t co achieve a greater separation between the two
<br />�°, �l��Y--� are no plans of this nature at this time, and staiiis not
<br />�vi��� �'�gard to the access or parking lot.
<br />ied staffbelieves the specific and general criteria, and the adverse
<br />;i'efore recommends the Planning Commission discuss the proposal
<br />on for action at their next meeting. He stated stafffeels there are
<br />proposal, and therefore, a positive recommendation to the City
<br />�tated the dimensional requirements listed on Page 6 of the StaffReport indicate
<br />on Long Lake Road is proposed to be 35 feet, and inquired if this was in error.
<br />Plannir►g l�ssociate Ericson stated this was in error and should indicate a 75-foot setback. He
<br />explained that on Page 2, Item A of the StaffReport indicates the existing front yard setback for the
<br />Church to be 90 feet along Long Lake Road. He noted with the expansion of the worship area, that
<br />setback would decrease to 75 feet, which is well within the minimum setback requirement of 3 5 feet.
<br />He pointed out that the proposed setback of 35 feet on County Road I was also in error, and should
<br />
|