Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />. <br />Mounds V�ew Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Fage 5 <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated on December 13, 1999, the City Cou <br />644, which amended the City Code to allow for billboards ��d other <br />conditional use in tfie City, on properties located north of f�zghway 10, <br />35W. He stated there are only a few properties in this a�'��;'�one of w <br />�,;;<;.:. <br />property, and others, which comprise Sysco Foods. ,<: <br />Planning Associate Ericson provided an overview of the � <br />pertaining to billboards. He indicated billboards must <br />residentially zoned property, the minimum spacing betweer� <br />sign area shall be no more than 700 square feet per sid�, <br />would be 35 feet. He stated a copy of this ordinance <br />;; <br />Commission for reference. <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that Eller i <br />billboards on the golf course site, and has �r�v <br />review. He indicated these renderings vc�ere <br />proposed at this time. He stated E]1�r;;M�edia � <br />nature. He pointed out that these ax-e no� the t <br />_ <br />standard single-pole, metallic type billboards, � <br />billboards were designed to be rrit�re �nvirorur�E <br />the go�f �;c��aa-�e. <br />...._. ;s <br />regardi��� <br />necessary <br />this is the <br />has b <br />s�gns as a <br />';;Xnterstate <br />uirements of the o�r�qY���►c'e <br />c� at least 250 feet from <br />i;; 1�000 feet, the maximum <br />������s�7A�n r�ieight of the sign <br />����`rar.��d ;to the Planning <br />_ _. <br />__ __ _ _ _.. <br />Yledia }�a� �r-�sefal:e;ci �Iie C1iy with a proposal for <br />ded r�r�r�erit��;,; �o�° tk�� sigris for the Commission's <br />an aGCUrate ����r�s�tj�ation of what was being <br />�as .proposing s�x si�ns, which are all of a similar <br />��acal type of billboard, and very dissimilar to the <br />�ormally seen: He explained that the proposed <br />ntally fr�eni�ly, and to fit into the environment of <br />Ericsor� r,t����ta�.c�ni�c� that all parties had been very clear in their sentiments <br />;;;,in �h�i �'ric;�/ h,�`c� 'I���:c nlesired or wanted, however, they are viewed as a <br />i�ssi�t with t��� ��giera�i�n of finances at the golf course. He explained that <br />`C'��� i'� considerii��;;il�.is proposal. <br />„ <br />PlannirigT'Associate �,f�icst�g� ;i �.t.�c# the City Council approved a resolution that authorizes this <br />,..;.<.. <br />venture with Eller Medi�, �rld %�s.�t��orizes the application for the Interim Use Permit. He stated at <br />tk�ei� last meeting, the �ity �ouncil adopted Ordinance 637 which added language into the <br />�,i.y;x.r, � <br />Tor�ing Code allowing ��r billboards in the Public Facilities and Conservancy Recreational, and <br />�A��sPrvation Zoning Dt5`tricts. He advised that this is an interim use, and some language in the <br />�::r'�c�� v✓ould require �o be amended to reflect this. He provided the Commission with a revised <br />��4z��I���ic�n, whi�l� �hanges the verbiage from "Conditional Use" to "Interim Use." He explained <br />�;i��.�; �I�� i� �axz�idered an interim use because there is an associated time line, which is a fifteen- <br />����� E�n,��d, afier which, the permits will expire. He advised that a conditional use does not <br />��c�ii��, therefore, the City Attorney has assisted in the drafting of this language, and has <br />recommended the term "Interim Use" be utilized. <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated that Ordinance 644 directs staff to review the interim use of <br />the billboard against the standards and criteria set forth for a conditional use, in that there are both <br />adverse affects criteria, and general conditional use criteria which must be examined. <br />