Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated there were five ad <br />Commission consideration. He indicated one of these criter <br />Comprehensive Plan. He explained that the City's Co� <br />billboards, therefore, there is no inconsistency in this re�ar� <br />geographical area involved, this is the area on which the, h�l <br />course property. He explained that there are five resident'ra� <br />feet from the golf course, on the south side of new Highwa� <br />from these properties. <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated the third <br />depreciate the area in which it is proposed. He sta <br />on the golf course property would be a detrimeni <br />added that it is not believed that the placement �ar <br />negative impact on the properties located soutfi of <br />Planning Associate Ericson explai <br />the golf course is a commercial ty <br />and wooded area. He stated the <br />more of an industrial type opez-a.t <br />industrial, �I� stated th� zi�� �;.d��'�� <br />such us�. 4=�� �ac�inted ou'c thal ir ��c <br />Plannin� �� <br />Commission <br />existing par� <br />sufficientl� t <br />erCie� He indicat� <br />P : '�� • <br />ainted out that th <br />�.: . <br />ance of at least 2 <br />�oards in relations} <br />rpretive issue, and>; <br />d.:tha:t with <br />operation <br />r�^a to the r� <br />n, and thr j <br />a for cor►�e�� <br />been f�ir1�� t <br />criteria <br />rns <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 6 <br />rs� affects �i_������� �c�r Planning <br />1�';the relations%T�j �� E:�a� �ase to the �y�,� <br />rrehensive Pl��� ���}c;� ��c�g; ��.�dress ����,_'� <br />y 1;�3 <br />�Ie advised :t�i�at wi��'�� r�;r�rc7, �,�� th� � <br />�ards v�citzlci be located r�� i:;�� ;,r�1� <br />�t��l��es located approxirna(;��,r �60 <br />U� ��ac� �1ze billboards w�ll be visible <br />are whetli�r : � <br />iats� believed ti1� <br />��r•C�k��;x cy value <br />',��i�� ,��f ihese <br />�is� will tend to <br />��i��ng of billboards <br />e golf course. He <br />ards would have a <br />�ard to the c�iaT-acter of the surrounding area, <br />'e stated there are some open space, wetlands, <br />h of the golf course is Sysco Foods, which is <br />perti�� �o the north of the golf course are all <br />�ian is �with regard to a demonstrated need for <br />r� as to why there is a need for the billboards. <br />icson s�aied �1�e�`�; ;�re eight general conditional use criteria for Planning <br />ti.�r��. He ��cp1��n�� �'��at the use must not create an excessive burden on <br />,�c�� public f'vcili�i�s, and billboards would not. He stated the use must be <br />t�z- �epaz�ateci by clistance or screening, from adjacent residentially zoned <br />:�i �:1��r� �r� no residentially zoned properties adjacent to the proposed site. <br />e��c� �t � properties located south of Highway 10, which are separated by a <br />6� ;'fe�f,' and possibly more, depending upon the exact location of the <br />i��;''to the property lines on the golf course. He advised that this is an <br />�`�afibelieves there would not be any adverse affect on those properties. <br />�l�r�nir�� .A�sso�ia�.P Ericson explained that another criteria specifies that the use and the opinion of <br />t1'n� �;ni:z�c�l i� r���onably related to the overall needs of the City and to the existing land use, <br />��J��a{;�} ;��., �een clearly stated. He stated the use must be consistent with the purposes of the <br />:�"oniri� Codc; and the Zoning District. He explained that with the passing of Ordinance 644 in <br />December, and Ordinance 637 the previous Monday, billboards would be a use consistent with <br />the Zoning Code. <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that this use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan of <br />the City, and would not cause traffic hazards or congestion. He indicated the last requirement <br />