My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000 Planning Commission Packets
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
2000 Planning Commission Packets
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2021 1:10:53 PM
Creation date
3/5/2012 3:44:55 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�y <br />Mounds View Planning Comm►ssion <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 15 <br />Mr. Cronin stated they have offered two images, and would work with �h� Cl�y. to find an <br />acceptable design. £"' <br />�;�:. <br />��y';yi <br />• � ;., <br />Chairperson Peterson stated that the proposal for the two nnpst'�westerly s�g�s to �k�� ��c��;�; or th� <br />wetland area indicates that they are initially to be constrt�cied as star�darti momo�r�i�l�. �>��lY1G�1��ci <br />structures, and the question of the construction materials o�"��rE� �i�ns as �ddressed ir� t�1�� �ag c���>f,��,b; <br />by the applicant. He noted however, there was nothing z��'��g�. ����1i���inr,e that specifi�s t�» ��f��f€rn <br />of the signs. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this was correct. <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if notices of this <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated all <br />notified. <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if <br />Planning Associate Ericson explai <br />City- owned properties on th� soixl <br />golf cotarsr, aa� �3laine, whic�� v�lc;r�' <br />subjeci ,;i9:�; �N�r�.. notified. ; <br />Ms. 01ser� :af���Liit��;c� i�`the five Ia�i.i=:. <br />and if they ha.c� a�l �����iv�d noti�fi�,� <br />resid <br />five <br />�1" there <br />side of <br />�tified a <br />in:�: t��c�;'U"�en mailed <br />residents. <br />n�St7 4�,c�. �}�' �:he ga,lf course property were <br />re than �ve properties, which include many <br />� 1Q, �:�sco, and some properties north of the <br />-�� s�ated all properties within 350 feet of the <br />to the south of the golf course were within 350 feet, <br />cd it ``u�as his understanding that notices were mailed to these <br />,,. <br />" Olsen inquired if �'<�ler Media has provided a cost estimate for the construction and <br />allation of the two si:�ns proposed for the golf course, itself. <br />ng Associate;;<�ricson stated at this time, he did not believe anything specific had been <br />:�I xr� terrn� �r� the type of City golf course signage would be approved. He stated the golf <br />,� ;., <br />�; ,;�i�n� �;r� not a part of this application, because they are allowed with the ordinance that <br />�c���t�c� the previous year. <br />Chairperson Peterson pointed out that there was a connection between these two proposals in the <br />sense that the financial offer that is made by this company helps the City toward the design and <br />construction costs of the signs currently under consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.