Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 16 <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated with regard to whether o�� ��.c�� �; <br />could approve this item without a recommendation of the Planning Commis�a�r.� � <br />�; � <br />of the ordinance indicates "The Planning Commission shall ma�� ��nding oa� f��;� ` <br />such actions or conditions relating to the request, as it deems n�cessary to G�,�'� y r�i <br />purpose of this title." He advised that the following par-��gY•���11 indicat�s ;"T`he �i <br />not grant a conditional use permit until it has received �. � t����n� � �f�r� irecommen� <br />>�ty Council <br />on 1125.01 <br />�{,ommena ;,,, <br />�raa3.r�i: and `�f45� <br />�,�, <br />a��x.�r,� �laall �� <br />_ .�� _ __. ...�. _ <br />Planning and Zoning Commission and the City staff, �� ��s:i�;il�� c��i ��c�ays after the ii� ��i a��:�r,�a�ai- <br />Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which the r�r.�Ta�;��. `��,�� �:c�nsidered." He explained <br />that according to the ordinance, the City Council could rule ��� E�. �t�r����:��rial use permit, after 60 <br />days from the first Planning Commission consideration of �k�e rriai.�.f;r. <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated page 5 of Eller lVl� <br />propose the two most westerly signs on the edg� 4��' <br />standard monopole billboard structures, and; fI�E��, <br />course is expanded." He pointed out that for those <br />skeleton, single-pole billboard, because th� golf cout <br />he did not see any nice designs for tliese monop�l� <br />been spent on the construction des�gz� o£�he other �'oi <br />Mr. Cronin st�ted they were <br />expansior�., �c�c�i�1g that it tiu4�i <br />recomr��r�c� �1:���: these si�r�� : <br />Arthur ]C➢�a�uIl'e ����r�� <br />construction �g�i�� r�3vin� <br />where un��rta�i7 af"�1�� <br />� .. y: <br />have b�Cick structur�� ir <br />S ,,, <br />str�tGf�res because of t <br />� �,. <br />He'�stated they had nc <br />stzuctures for the exb <br />however, <br />���Fz�r;'`gi���j�osal incli�����'it��` s�atement "We <br />�1��r; �.��k�aAat�,ar�a be oi�i�sxa�i�lly constructed as <br />be c�i�v�r��c� �o �his �esigrn when the golf <br />f��teet� y�:a��, rlae �tty could be looking at a <br />Se �expai�sic�n m�� riot ever occur. He stated <br />"signs, althaugh much time appears to have <br />ir signs <br />unclear Y-�;s;��r.�c�i�1� �h� �chedule anticipated for the golf course <br />� appro�J��xt;�r� :t��;�c�x�amendation of the Planning Commission to <br />he othef �: ���. �xplained that this was not a requirement they <br />3.iiv� of �`11�x- :i'��dia stated the original intent of the two poles was for <br />�,r��� ��urpo>���; �n��that access to this area is somewhat dif�icult, and they <br />li �;c��:}��s� �x�a�ision schedule. He indicated that if the City would like to <br />xx� �r+;�c7, this could be done, however, they had proposed the single pole <br />�a��.����d, and because they were uncertain if they would have to move. <br />�ar�r�c� to do this type of construction, and then have to relocate the <br />5ion of the golf course, which would involve a great expense. He <br />City would like to have brick structures in this area, this could be done. <br />inquired regarding the State criteria for obtaining a permit to allow for the <br />I�r. ]7ean indicated the City's criteria for billboards are more stringent than the State criteria. He <br />commented they were confident the State would respond favorably in this regard. <br />Chairperson Peterson stated one of the criteria of the State is that these signs be based in a <br />commercial area. <br />