Laserfiche WebLink
K <br />Mounds View Plnnning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 17 <br />Mr. Dean stated this was correct, however, a precedent had already been s <br />similar situation. Mr. Cronin added that the issue of the dual p�ria�tting is' <br />Commission or the staff, and it is addressed in the resolution �e �tated thf <br />the unique nature of the Mounds View Public Facilities 7a�rar��� Code, as . <br />elsewhere in the Metropolitan area, they were confiden� cl�r��`�ould obt�z� <br /><.,,. <br />from the State. ' <br />Commissioner Miller stated she was uncomfortable with ��„��-� <br />effectively cut Sysco out of the picture, although the City Ca��� <br />this regard. `"`"'''" <br />Commissioner Hegland advised that there <br />regardless. He indicated the City could be <br />ruling pertaining to the problem with the crit� <br />Commissioner Stevenson suggested the <br />the location of the most westerly sign <br />application has now come forwa� d� <br />slightly, because there are great�r t�ar� <br />matter may come back to the pla.nziing <br />other issu��,, Y��� sign in cic��,�;,L nx�q�ci►nit <br />to know i�"�1jiw i� �ossibl�-" <br />�:�OXI. <br />design as <br />installed, <br />to the fir; <br />�missio <br />ld be f <br />1,000 <br />to <br />er crty, �n a <br />���u� to the <br />`,��a'r, due to <br />;r zl� ,.� Ci;lOriS <br />n <br />ioi- six signs, which rr�ay <br />i�verrule their decision in <br />�olution �i�r i1�� Sysco proposal <br />��st for vas�i�?�ir,c:, or some sort of <br />n send thiJ ifE��xt bacic to the Council, to see if <br />�amined, with the awareness that the Sysco <br />might be��rossible to adjust the six locations <br />�'eet be�aeen them. He pointed out that the <br />wa�l�:�n�'ormation that due to the wetlands or <br />����c1 not be relocated, however, he would like <br />�e r,vat�!id �il� e to see a standard set with regard to the billboard <br />tha� tt��s ''is �1�� only place in the City where billboards will ever be <br />c1 set a,��r��ard to indicate that the rest of the billboards be similar <br />,,; <br />Cor�n�ssioner Hegland ,inc����iec1 if the Sysco billboards would be subject to a sunset clause as <br />,., <br />vu�`��� Commissioner K�d`e►t.,s�ated the City ordinance contains the fifteen-year sunset clause. <br />.: ;__ <br />�?;��nning Associate Er�Gson stated this was correct. He explained that the sunset clause applies to <br />,� . <br />th� biliboards on the �olf course, as well as the billboards that would be located on the Sysco <br />��rc�p���y. " ". <br />�,��rru�ia�s�an� Stevenson inquired if either of the billboards on Sysco property would be <br />i�i c�r�����c�a�a[ billboards pertaining to this company. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated it was his understanding that these would be standard outdoor <br />advertising signs. <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired who would be responsible for removing the signs, after the <br />fifteen-year period. <br />