|
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ i � _ _ - _ - _ __ _ _ _ _____ : _ y; _�
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999
<br />Regular Meeting Page 9
<br />event that more wetlands gained than removed, the City could create a bank of credits that can be
<br />utilized to mitigate other wetlands.
<br />Commissioner Johnson stated, therefore, the City would gain with regard to subject property, in that
<br />they could utilize that property to mitigate the wetlands for another development, and gain these
<br />.::r:,;,:
<br />credits. �. :::;�;�y''
<br />Community Development Director Jopke stated this was p
<br />an overall stormwater issue in this particular area of the �
<br />some of these issues could be resolved by creating a regic
<br />controlled by the City. He added this could meet the r��
<br />property, and replace the pond that was put in for the s5:���
<br />Commissioner Johnson stated he was aware that the pond
<br />therefore, the City could benefit by ownership of that la
<br />Community Development Jopke advised the City Cou��il �a��
<br />the location of the stormwater pond for the stre�fi ��'r§i����4'.
<br />on the east side of the new road, versus the w�st side, i�� ���t�
<br />the road might be rnoved, and less work wc�uld then b�>� �:��� #
<br />S.
<br />�:��• , ,,�,;.
<br />such matters. �;:� ,��;;;`���
<br />Community Development Dir
<br />designations of the Commurnity
<br />Videen sit� � � �o�ed B-3, aY�c� ?�a�s
<br />Council gi�t�,°5 �lpproval, at�r� �r��€3,�
<br />Developt�e��. ��rt��ss, as 'c1°ae: c�k
<br />zoning
<br />Community L?,.esr�t4p��ic,�:
<br />,;.,..
<br />:.,
<br />in terms of:�e zonin� ��
<br />for the �dland Vide��
<br />Coir�ma�nity Commerci�l
<br />w�tl�� �his designation. H
<br />al� ��gewood Drive n�
<br />�����s•�d �;��ould be const�i�
<br />v� �
<br />tially cotEE�{;a �'�a'''�oted there is also
<br />�rid i� I��i;; ��� ��xt �:��:��;ussed that the��
<br />storm�va�cA��`jsF�a:E�� ���a ��3�� `Iideen s���,
<br />of any.�ten�,�t �+�:vc����r,.c��i ���the
<br />ed to the east in the future,
<br />used iriia�� �'t'a���>�ght when considering
<br />��� ����latta��n �.��7� the pond was located
<br />����?tior� tl�t a� some time in the future,
<br />-� ��, �x� 1'��fr►s of pipe removal and other
<br />,Jnpke at�i�ised that.��n terms of the Comprehensive Plan
<br />er, a�lc, ���t° 1'ubl�c��cilities zoning, the portion ofland onthe
<br />;dium c��X������ �o�sing designation. He stated, therefore, ifthe
<br />�sal pro�'-n����3 vat�h the zoning process through the Planned Unit
<br />��r pro,�o:�es, it will also be necessary to clean up some of the
<br />�;t��ctaons on the property.
<br />°cro:� Jo�l�� stated the City property would require to be re-designated
<br />�� �_'j,rr�prehensive Plan, as well as the Comprehensive Plan designation
<br />���; r��lded that the Comprehensive Plan update indicates this area as a
<br />�,�i�a� 1Development, and the proposed development would be consistent
<br />inted out that other potential City actions would be the vacation of the
<br />=way, and the Wetland Buffer Permit, which would be required because
<br />within the 100-foot buffer area.
<br />���r��i���t�a.�E ;r �„���r�;lopment Director Jopke indicated that some re-platting of this property would be
<br />req�ar�r��'; ���� adv�sed it would be necessary to create an official parcel of the remnant parcel in order
<br />to transi�� ownership to the developer. He added that part ofthis process would include the City Hall
<br />property, as a corner of this property is currently a part of that parcel, and it would have to be
<br />included in the plat. He commented this would provide the City the opportunity to clean up other
<br />issues pertaining to City Hall, such as the correction of some of the utility easements. He added that
<br />Bronson Drive, located on the north side of the City Hall site, is not a dedicated road and does not
<br />
|