Laserfiche WebLink
�dY ; � � __ _ _ <br />_ _ <br />,= - . -_ � <br />� ..�___ __. : - �- --------- -- - - ---. _ _ . . . - -°- - - "r --- --' = <br />Mounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />appear on any County maps as a road, but is simply a piece of roadway across the City Hall parcel. <br />He pointed out that matters of this nature could be resolved during the platting process as well. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated the Council is seeking a recommendation from the <br />Planning Commission based upon the alternatives and the present proposal, in terms3Qf whether or <br />;s, <br />not this development is an appropriate land use, and if it fits in with the over�ll City I��iI�`campus type <br />of development. �� ,,; ��� <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired if there were any mainten�ti�� <br />Community Development Director Jopke advised there wou�� �i'e � <br />if the City acquires the property and the stormwater ponds xe�t�uire <br />made, such as trails and pedestrian areas, they must be rt����i�ain <br />Commissioner Hegland inc�uired if MNDot would have <br />Highway 10, and what issues were presented with regar <br />Community Development Director Jopke indicated <br />would be approved. He explained that the State i� � <br />State roads. He stated although this road is in ��''p <br />�;::.. <br />is somewhat less restrictive in this re�ard�:�i#"inav <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired <br />Cunningham stated there was ap� <br />feet of <br />be is�u� <br />icent t� <br />to the wetl <br />�3 a;he sense <br />the additional access off of <br />�s z-�;i��� ���o guarantee that this <br />�����v�� �.dditional access onto <br />� back to the County, which <br />and not be permitted. <br />frontage along Highway 10. Mr. <br />Commission�r Johnson aslc�:t� �v���re the cic�s�:�c ��..cc��s'to the site off of Highway 10 was located. <br />Communit�r D��elopmen:i �.?����;�t��- J"opke st����3's,�ai's'access is located at County Road H-2. <br />Commissiota:��° ,�s�����„�>�, stat�d i-�� ��r�s��l� not anticipate a great issue with the County with regard to <br />an access at tr►is'�����.���.��>�q, � it v�ou�d� f��s� ��qiaire a new curb cut, and would utilize the old Edgewood <br />Drive access �����g��r,a���f ���;��elo������> a� Dire�tor Jopke commented that this area was utilized in the <br />., .�_.� •: <br />past, how��t�et, rt ha� u�n�t� ct�s�� of�: <br />,,,;�: <br />� .. ;. <br />�� =z> <br />Com�ISSioner Hegland �i�'€�;�? ��i� Comprehensive Plan provides for sidewalks in this area, and <br />ana�tt�er access might poS�'a problem in terms of pedestrian traffic. <br />4�ll:�lity Develop�ent Director stated these issues were very good and would require further <br />'�r, s�����v�K-, �;y would be resolved through the Planned Unit Development and Development <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired when the transfer process of the roadway would be completed. <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated he was uncertain. <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if MNDot would no longer be a factor in this consideration, once the <br />road is turned back to the County. Community Development Director Jopke stated this was correct. <br />