Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 25 <br />Commissioner Johnson stated there had been some discussion that the b <br />_. <br />prevent the golf balls from being hit out of the golf course. ,;;�%;;;;; <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated was awar� a��' this discus��c>t� �-��; <br />that Golf Course Superintendent Hammerschmidt has b��n considert�ig thc c:cr; <br />berming along the highway. He stated the proposed billi�t;�Kd� are c��signed to fit <br />berm. <br />actually <br />out <br />Ms. Olsen suggested the Planning Commission include F� r�.�i��'��, '�� i:��e Council in their <br />recommendation that they consider decreasing the numb�x oi bi�il�c��j�c��s t�, �, in the event that <br />other alternatives for the fair treatment of Sysco are not a�vailable. �he, �;�X��aancd that this might <br />provide the Council with an option they might not o%�a���7ai��� b� aware o�'. <br />Chairperson Peterson explained that if such a�,�ttua�ion <br />�,<;3• . <br />stipulation to the resolution, at their next Ctinsiderati <br />stated he was not aware that a specific aGtion at thi�, <br />however, it may be perceived as unnec�ssarily antagQri <br />Commissioner Stevenson expl� <br />allowed to have their two si�ras, <br />He stated i�i�e� Council woudti ��;��. <br />how�v���, ��� ;1�aving it c��j�z� t <br />deterrru��� r��c �n�ans to accot�.�l' <br />Commissionet� �--I��;l��xc9.: <br />the signs that; i�z�v� �r;�,, <br />the time,tk��::�ysco a������ <br />�:. <br />. � �� " - <br />Cori�missioner Hegland <br />H:.::� <br />,::_: :. <br />p;��iperty line issue, the� <br />�� regard at this time a.. <br />w���� {,�r �-�Yi��,, the Coir►mission could add a <br />�;_�, ax�d r����7a�m�n� this at that time. He <br />#ime woul� ner,�;ssarily assist in this issue, <br />stic. <br />,;;. <br />�a�cJ. that cl�� �:'oinmissiat� uwould recommend that Sysco be <br />���c� work tl�i� c�a�E. .with t�i�� City, thereby, leaving it open-ended. <br />,h��rc� that ai�x� c�a�'r�e sr��utions would be to drop one of the signs, <br />s <br />�r��d, the �1���rz�iz�g ���Commission would allow the Council to <br />quirec� �F <br />�t-�seclted <br />�y �a�r�. language to indicate that Sysco's signs should match <br />Co�imissioner Stevenson stated this should be addressed at <br />�ut: that they were requesting Sysco and the City to work out the <br />would appear to be appropriate to provide a recommendation in <br />ssioner N1i�e�`'�stated it would not be necessary to require the signs be identical. <br />�<:<::�::_ :: <br />ssioner;�egland stated they should be complimentary. <br />��qr�i;�aiu�,���K��r Stevenson stated these signs are not before the Planning Commission at this time. <br />�hairpex-son l�eterson added that there is not even a formal application at this time. <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated the Commission members all appeared to be in agreement that <br />something should be included pertaining to the content of the signs. <br />