Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />� <br />Mounds View Planning Commission <br />Regular Meeting <br />February 16, 2000 <br />Page 26 <br />Chairperson Peterson stated this language could indicate that `It is the P <br />recommendation that the property owners add a clause to their. ;l�a,se agre� <br />retain the right to remove objectionable signage. He pointed �ut that if <br />could retain that right, this was probably the best that could ��xpected. - <br />Commissioner Johnson stated the time to make this reco <br />before the Planrung Commission with their proposal. <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated they were recommending <br />He stated they could indicate in their notes that this was c <br />resolution. He added that they could indicate th�t z�obo <br />signs, however, they would like this point to be exar��i�icc� 1 <br />Chairperson Peterson stated that even if <br />ordinance, it could be added to the lease ag <br />Planning Associate Ericson inquired i� the : <br />resolution be drafted, or that staff �i�rp�y sit d <br />Planning Commission's recommend�i�ons witl�. <br />ent. <br />��n��ation wo <br />h�a � �3t'� ��:�'i.ti,r ,� <br />SCl1SS�C� ti,y;,t?i <br />y ha.s co„�.�c� <br />� r.kiP �City �;o <br />i r;�ryni�� this <br />Yng Con <br />with the <br />d to the� <br />1���7air�,� �'s�#n�nission's <br />,�:����. �;;:r�i.i���; that they <br />�rc�ti� ���ci����ii,y owners f��<� <br />; <;� <br />be when �v�f;c� �;����� <br />1 keep this in mind, <br />�, and is lost in the <br />�t�e content of the <br />addressed in the <br />�n was recommending that a <br />cil and provide a report on the <br />Commissl����;:r ;tevenson 4,i�Y�r� ihis would ��� ����aopt�ate, adding that staff should convey the <br />Commis;;i«c�' ;����ason for i;�,�l�t��'������is item, tiv��i�1� ��5entially is that they are not ready to vote on <br />the ma#�e�� �a, t1ai� �:ifn�, bF�;�tis� �a�`�h.c;�;e issues. <br />Planning Assv�;;��t�; ��i�;;��7� provic±�r� � su�rr�nary of the items that the Planning Commission would <br />like to have adr�z•����� ifi��tks. th� �"ounril. �� stated the first item pertains to the spacing of signs <br />with relatt��hship tc� t�1�; �;�;�c� .s�roperty; the second item is that all signs be of similar construction, <br />and th�; tliird item is �1��� i��; 1eas�;, agreement contain language that the property owner reserves <br />the�ng�it to refuse objec�ac�a��.'r�1�- �>ontent. <br />nmissioner Kaden ir�yuired if the Commission would like to include a comment regarding the <br />dent's concern pertaining to depreciated property values. . <br />tet`��ricson stated this issue was very vague, and he was uncertain what the <br />to address this. <br />Chairperson Peterson commented that if he were in this situation, he would be far more concerned <br />with regard to traffic noise. <br />Commissioner Miller stated this resident was aware of approximate locations of the billboards, <br />however, she was not certain this resident could be so specific at this time, as to state the <br />billboard would be visible from her window. <br />