Laserfiche WebLink
;; <br />� <br />N <br />, ,. _ <br />� -,; r , . : . _ - � <br />-�----_- �., - ._,— _ , -u.___ �`_;__� ..��_ .�_ _ja .�, .. . :: ----- ---- ----- - - — --u� - _- ---- <br />-- ' --- _ __ <br />Mounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired how the billboard fits into the site plan. He pointed out that the <br />property owner would probably not want the billboard situated in front of the proposed building. <br />Mr. Cunningham stated this was correct. He explained that they would attempt to purchase the <br />easement, however, billboard space continues to increase in value. He indicated at some point in the <br />>;:_;<:.. <br />future, they will make an economic proposition to have it removed. �, �;`:: -' <br />�:L �. <br />•��:��� <br />Commissioner Berke stated this appeared to be a good propos�a, and tk�� �9���i��iment would be of <br />value to the community, particularly with regard to the buil�ing tiesign , <br />Commissioner Stevenson agreed. He commented that with.£fi�te site <br />type of development would certainly be proposed, howevPA$ ���.'s;; pr� <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if some trees would remai <br />Mr. Cunningham stated they would leave as many trees�"as pos <br />leave the trees located along the property line, as wel� x5�' � ��;�e� b <br />that there were no homes within 300 feet of th�;�irp����f ��� ����v� <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if <br />through facility. <br />Mr. Cunningham explained that � <br />Development document, howeve��''. <br />stores in the.�J[etropolitan a��;��. <br />he was not <br />this is <br />flnqu�r�c� �x �t�� <br />le with <br />rson Peterson <br />there is a sub <br />� <br />late <br />�e 9 <br />�n alor� <br />would <br />ained they intended to <br />t�e homes. He added <br />limit the hours of the drive- <br />�ours of operation in the Planned Unit <br />m. to 9:00 p.m,, for 7 of the Walgreens <br />any evergreen trees on the land. Mr. Cunningham stated <br />� E�1�,7 ,,i�r�reen trees would provide a year-round buffer from vehicle <br />����ted'they could propose additional landscape buffer, and provide <br />,.az�icling landscape. <br />1 what the developer would propose, in the event the County does not <br />need for access off of Highway 10. <br />�����-. �� ���s�.�tl�1��,��<�r� e���iiained they have discussed this matter with both the State and the County. He <br />s����� { R� ir �:-€'��� ;s�ntative of the County has indicated their requirement standards are less stringent <br />thaYi ����; �:yi��t� r��;q�ai�•ements. He commented that the State tends to guard the rapid flow of traffic on <br />arterial roads such as Highway 10, and the County may recognize the need for access to businesses <br />along the highway. He stated however, if this is not permitted, they would request a right-turn into <br />the site. �Ie pointed out there are other options, however, providing adequate access is clearly the <br />best retail solution. <br />