Laserfiche WebLink
� _� I^ �:.r>�._._ --- __. _ . . , . . � <br />_ _ _ _ _ ___ <br />, --=- ° � -----= . _ <br />k ;-. ' -- -- - -- : : , <br />Mounds View Planning Commission November 17, 1999 <br />Regular Meeting Pa�e 13 <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if there were any signage issues with the proposal. <br />Community Development Director Jopke advised these issues could be resolved as the matter <br />proceeds. He explained at this point, the Commission should consider the basic land use, in terms <br />of whether or not the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area, and if this particular proposal <br />fits in at this location, the Commission can qualify the specific details in thei� recom��ridation to the <br />Council. ` � � <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if any Tax Increment Finan <br />Community Development Director Jopke indicated no T <br />Chairperson Peterson stated this development appears <br />ible use <br />for this proj <br />�u�ld be utili; <br />Commissioner Laube stated this would be a good project For $���;�, �����c�' i.i�e c�ity would benefit through <br />the acquisition ofthe wetlands. He indicated his only con����� c� 3'z��i ����;;y �,ao �iot loose any wetlands. <br />Commissioner Johnson stated he concurred with this. C'�mnu�, 7icf�,:� �- k�����'��:� agreed. <br />Commissioner Kaden indicated he was in fav,Qr t��' ����E���t��,an� ��V�Ia��'��ns store in this area, as <br />. v �: <br />opposed to a more residential area. <br />� _.� <br />ja,jo,. :.e <br />Council Member Stigney inquired if th� �awners s��"'the th����>�� �aad made a proposal on this site. <br />x> � : <br />Chairperson Peterson stated this rr�att�r �vas disc�ssed a year;'prior, and was also a very compatible <br />use of the property. < � �`��` <br />,.: ;��s <br />�<,;�,-•. <br />Communit� ��ev�:lopment b�"��rrt�z� Jopke ����da�:����ci ��:nne time, Anthony Properties indicated they. <br />would lik� �� �.i��i_ox� the.�����y�..�-�y9 �oweve7-, ����y did� not proceed to this point. He stated they had <br />indicate� ���� �������i, devea��3 �rsrr;�r;'�ai�ildi�l�� �ilnilar to those proposed at the theater, however, he <br />r° �.9 r <br />was uncertai���. r�� ��a� ��atu� �� r���.� ��F�s'��.��,�_� <br />Commissionex, �,��.�.�1��� <br />constructe�<at��the 'r.��c�a <br />,::. <br />at the t���.ter comprise <br />Cc��amissioner Laube <br />T�t`sr���or Jopke stated �t <br />.� <br />�`;��rtr���� ���ar�eA 7��-��so� <br />� �<�1i��.������. �.�a .�:?,�i�;�wo� <br />hol����dr �€s�c�: <br />:���f� c„c± if �i�� �'��-oposed buildings would be smaller than the buildings <br />,'���.��:s�anunity Development Director Jopke indicated the office buildings <br />�,4C�£) �:;�,uare feet. <br />aired if this represented a higher tax base. Community Development <br />was possible. <br />stated the owners of the theater were interested in the land, prior to the <br />l Drive. He pointed out that any developer would now have to relocate the <br />Commissioner Miller stated this appeared to be the best offer for the site, and something they could <br />work with. <br />