Laserfiche WebLink
.�' _ . . . . . . _ _ . . . _ . . � } _��lr'� . �� ,�r�� >�" r ` . � <br />� « _-= �-�- .� �-�'-� � � - ��'.: ��-�. , � � ..'T' �c � . 1 � -` . �.� �" <br />l• ` <br />�i.%�'� , laa)�i���`�'1.��. i%�'`�#ti�///r.� , : !� /� y, n. .. �'!/�i%r// <br />,. _._:.--'-:,.- - ;s _: . ` � _ _ I _ <br />I- - - �:- —° ---- : , _ �,�. — --- -- ' <br />( <br />Mounds View Planning Commission March 15, 2000 � <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />minimum spacing requirements. He pointed out that if the variance is denied, the applicant,would <br />i.,,. <br />be allowed one billboard, subject to the siting requirements as outlined in the City Code;t�:rid the <br />Sign Code. _ . .. . _s'`''=�. <br />�;;. <br />,; :!• <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the third stipul� <br />stipulation pertaining to the variance, the locations of the p� <br />indicated on Exhibit A, which is attached to the resolution. <br />the locations of both the billboards proposed for the Syscc <br />City golf course. He pointed out that the first billboar� <br />proximity to the second billboatd on the Sysco property, ti <br />explained that the distance between these two billboards <br />Planning Commission were to review a variance applicatio� <br />the spacing of these signs meet the 500-foot MnDot minim� <br />previous <br />��� 'r,[�� ,�?�1t course 1s 1r� a� •x a� �{��r;�: <br />�z ,��x;- r��;��;ssitating the variaf.±r,:;. k �� <br />� 1��3t) d:�a �;�0 feet, therefore, if the <br />���d ���� 1�;�������; �hat a hardship exists, <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated the last two st�j�t��<�����i� �af s:he r��of�fl�:����� ����r� housekeeping <br />��, <br />in nature. He explained that the applicant is rec�u�r�'1>t� t•���i�r� �, �opy oi� i.h�; �:.`btralcil resolution of <br />approval with Ramsey County, and if the�''pticant is ���i���z, ��� �btat�°`the required billboard <br />pernuts from MnDot, the interim use pernu� ��all be cAnszc�e� f.�� �.�s�.�� ��,id. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated <br />residents within 350 feet of the pr <br />foot radius of Sysco. <br />Peter° <br />the buY-c���� ,�i <br />property, �w�� <br />to site thE bi <br />that the prc� <br />:�nn was a public hear��, and staff mailed notification to <br />, as we,� �s to the c�t�r�ofBlaine, which is within the 350- <br />;,. <br />r�presedlt�r,A�t t,��'"�;�sco Foo�� '?�a�r� ��i,ite Outdoor Advertising, indicated they <br />�,; , <br />�� recoxnYr,,`��r��� s;���� ���° a�prova�; �a���ever, they disagreed with the conditions that <br />�cs�t��G� be on �y�t,� �����.i �'���",aF� �o seek the variance to site the two signs on the Sysco <br />i�.�a �� i�i� �riva�e ��-���a-`,�, I:��e stated it was not disputed there was ample land area <br />I1���F��'� ;; ��i�h six on`��-�� �c��� t�ourse, and two on the Sysco property. He explained <br />����=f� ���.���� i�� th�.� ��l�i� �,���A" course design configuration and the wetland on the <br />�� � as. �xi�f���� �r� �.ate the billboards in a manner that would allow the maximum <br />� has availa.i�I� ���� ��� `two proposed billboards. <br />Coyle reiterated the� `did'not agree that the burden should be on Sysco and DeLite to apply <br />the variance, becau��'the hardship is clearly present on the golf course property. He pointed <br />chat the City has:�not completed action on its own application, and they believe it would be <br />�, �p�ropriate �t�� the City Council to take action on a variance as relates to its own <br />�� �������, �-�����;� `than put the private applicant in the position of having to compete with the <br />F���- �� �a,a .�:�����Y�nval of their second billboard location. <br />Mz°. Coyle stated City staff has recommended, and they have agreed to do all they are able to <br />design their monopole structures to be compatible with the ground signs proposed for the golf <br />course. He indicated Sysco has sent the City a letter, informing it that ground signs were not <br />feasible on their property, as they would create a safety hazard for the truck traf�c. He explained <br />that they propose to utilize a brick wrap-around of the pole to provide a complementary style, and <br />