|
rk
<br />F � � _ �I
<br />�-_;{ .= s�
<br />�� � :
<br />,_-_ • „
<br />�, ; ,- .- _-_ ,_ —
<br />= ! _"
<br />-::r ---- - -- _ _ - _
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission
<br />Regular Meeting
<br />April 5, 2000
<br />Page 4
<br />requirements including spillage, glare, and foot-candle measurements onto adjacent
<br />well as with regard to the centerlines of Knollwood Drive and County Road H2.
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated at the previous meeting, an
<br />regard to the location of an accessory building on the site. I��
<br />agreed to relocate this structure to address this concern. h,:
<br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated the Fire Marshall h�
<br />circulation and the presence of fire hydrants, and these
<br />explained that the circulation and the width of the drive ai�
<br />vehicle purposes. He indicted an additional fire hydrant �
<br />H2, which should service the facility very adequately, and t
<br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the City Engineer ��
<br />He advised that the stormwater calculations app�a�° e
<br />appears to be sized for those calculations. He �{c�i�it�;�
<br />full future buildout of the facility, therefore, fu��er rev;
<br />with future phases would not be required, �ess the p,�a
<br />Creek Watershed District would a1�o x-��rz�w this �ti
<br />actions should be available for con�zc����<����n at the��"ine
<br />Planning Associate Ericson
<br />such a lon� time, it has �ox
<br />institu�i�� � :��a r��;sidential ����
<br />the pr�:y� :a��� �� �.i,�: �htaY��,��.,:
<br />I011g �la'��� r!� {i�Ta� '?',^�`sOY� !�di
<br />Clt�1 COC�� r;:t'�+a^���':� �.i��'!: "�:�1�•
<br />criteria.
<br />�;
<br />this
<br />as
<br />was a��-�z��«Ss. ;�rward with
<br />ined �.���� ���;� �.���j�licant has
<br />tCY:
<br />:�ie�taining �� ,�a�sa:�s� ��°�f'ac
<br />;``�also been rF�c,��;�:��. .7��.
<br />Ej��ble for Fire I�e�<��.���ler►t
<br />>A�ll�� along County �oad
<br />;�����f� ��.l�o be sprinklered.
<br />��� ��a�����,�;��a�,A���',> drainage plan.
<br />order, a�a�i r��� ,;��A��,ater pond
<br />ih� stormwat��� �oY�d is sized for
<br />' ��.+,���1�t���x�Y� ponding or drainage
<br />�; tg�;���F7�;antly. He indicated Rice
<br />�A��, ��iiforYnation concerning their
<br />goes before the City Council.
<br />out tha�. ��G�;��.�s� thP-'r��iurch has existed in its location for
<br />�the City �`�c���s;, �;�r����,�•��iment that churches and other similar
<br />�.ve a co�������>���.�'��s�^ ��ermit. He indicated that staffbelieves
<br />���-�� t1��� �� �a��` �een a good neighbor in the City for such a
<br />�=�r:=.i:�f; r:h� conditional use permit. He advised however, that
<br />��;�� ��s of the use, and the general conditional use permit
<br />riamm�� ��sociate e`��� ��.� ws;��� f�,�e �;c� there is an issue with regard to the screening on the site, and
<br />that i�i�`being addres�� �� �'.i� �- �r ���';the landscape plan. He indicated staff received a letter from a
<br />re '� nt who is also ��_���,: ��„ {= about the screening and about the fact that the site would be
<br />,� .-
<br />s��ificantly changed. ]E��� explained that the site is currently heavily wooded, and a large number
<br />rxs ,:; �y �es would be rem(�ed with this project. Ericson stated this provides the opportunity to
<br />, .,
<br />:�,f1��w this request '., �erms of the adverse effects to the neighborhood, and staff believes the
<br />3���� <;�� ��ndscape�p��'is a major step forward in resolving these issues.
<br />'�'?<:r 5���;': �.�.x �;�i'ate Ericson explained that the Planning Commission should determine whether or
<br />x?�' �:�;' �`a�aa�;�ar with staf�s assessment and takes into consideration the residents' concerns. With
<br />the exception of the fore-mentioned letter, staff has not received any additional feedback in this
<br />regard. He stated he was in contact with the resident who wrote the letter and he had indicated
<br />he would attempt to make contact with the Church. He explained that if this resident has any
<br />suggestions with regard to the landscaping and screening, these would probably be brought
<br />%rward prior to Council consideration on Apri124.
<br />
|